• Prethoryn Overmind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 year ago

    Finally, a person with an actual voice. I feel like the, “Switch to Linux,” don’t realize they sound like, “Just get an iPhone people.” To me it all sounds like, “well if you don’t like being in this country then just leave.”

    Linux is not the answer for all people the same as switching to an iPhone should never just be the answer.

    • rivalary@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t get it. If a product sucks, why wouldn’t you switch away from it?

      “Don’t suggest I leave my abusive husband, instead I’ll complain about him to my friends until he magically gets better.”

      Christ, you guys sound like you have Stockholm syndrome.

        • tabular@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          If the alternatives are not there or lacking then people can’t switch. If people don’t use it and contribute (e.g. reports, donations) then it is difficult to justify creating alternatives.

          This is not a stalemate however. It is a slow transition of pioneers frustrated with the status quo.

        • LexiMax
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          More importantly, the reason why all of those apps don’t have Linux versions is not because of some anti-Linux conspiracy, but because Linux userspace has for most of its existence prioritized distro-packaged-and-provided software, at the expense and sometimes even exclusion of binary software distribution.

          This is not just a technical limitation, but I’d also argue a cultural one, driven by folks who consider proprietary/nonfree software irrelevant and not worth supporting in a first-class way. Unfortunately, the companies who make both the software that entire industries are built around and the games that you play when you get off work disagree. Valve was probably the company in the best position to make native Linux games a trend, and the fact that they’re more focused on Proton these days is pretty telling.

          The only developers in the Linux ecosystem who I feel are taking the problem seriously are the Flatpak developers. They do amazing work, with great tooling that builds against a chrooted runtime by default. But it needs more widespread usage and acceptance, as well as better outreach to developers from other ecosystems who might’ve had horrendous experience making Linux builds in the past.

          There is a future out there with native Linux builds of industry-standard tooling and even games. But it’s a future the Linux community has to willing to actually work towards.

          • tabular@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Is it not “serious” to work towards a better future because that’s more difficult to obtain? There is a future out there where more industries are dominated by software that respects user freedom. The games industry has changed over the years and it is my hope people will not tolerate it forever. Even if I achive no impact with my games I can look back and see I tried for what I thought was the better moral outcome.

            • LexiMax
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Is it not “serious” to work towards a better future because that’s more difficult to obtain? There is a future out there where more industries are dominated by software that respects user freedom.

              I do not believe that distros ignoring the problem of binary software distribution is actually accomplishing anything productive on that front. All it does is put a gigantic KEEP OUT sign for most outside developers who might have briefly considered porting their software. Package maintainers are also incredibly overburdened, and are often slow to update their packages even on rolling release distros.

              Worse, it also inconveniences their userbase, pushing them to solutions their that bypass the distro completely such as third-party repos, Steam, Wine, Flatpak, Docker, or even running Linux in WSL. All of them function as non-free escape hatches, but all of them are inferior to distros getting their act together and deciding that binary software distribution is a problem worth collaborating on and solving together.

              • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I tried to get wine to work on my RX580, and the card could t even support it. It’s only the last few AMD video card generations that do.

            • XPost3000@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Why not both? I don’t see how proprietary software on Linux will slow down FOSS at all, and it’ll only bring more users to Linux who otherwise have to use windows for their software, so overall more FOSS users in the community

              And programs like Blender have already matured to a professional level, so I’m pretty optimistic that other FOSS apps will eventually follow, too

              • tabular@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                If the goal is software freedom for everyone then proprietary software working on Linux isn’t the end goal. Maybe it’s good - a step towards the end game - but I worry it’s a peak which is difficult to get down and up to a higher peak. Proprietary software on Linux is convenience above freedom.

                • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  AutoCAD has been industry standard for 40 years now, and it’s never going away. Can’t run it on Linux. It and Revit are 100% mandatory in construction/ arch / engineering

                  • tabular@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I have heard of those examples before but I have no use for that so I have not learned specifics to talk about.

                    Would bet it is harder to combat that “this will never change” mindset in the userbase than actually making alternatives. For 20 years from the 50’s it was normal for ALL software to be public domain. Times change, and it’s up to us users if they want better.

                • XPost3000@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yeah, that’s what I’m getting at, proprietary software on Linux is just a step forward towards a fully FOSS future

                  For the most part, there aren’t many professional fields that have a good FOSS option, so in the meantime their only option is to keep using the industry standard until a good alternative matures like Blender has

                  At the very least, people would have the freedom to not use microsoft or apple while still working professionally in their respective industry, so that’s more free overall

        • AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ll add Visual Studio.

          And, no, VS Code is not a comparable replacement no matter how many extensions you add. I say that as someone who uses VS Code for almost everything…except C#.

        • rivalary@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yep, definitely have to pick the right tool for the job. If you use these things, you’re stuck with Windows. Would be nice if you could install needed software on whichever OS you choose.

      • duckCityComplex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve been running Linux on all the machines I own for years, but I still have to run Windows for work. Not everyone can just switch and I doubt there are many reading this who are unaware they could switch to Linux (or Mac, BSD, etc.).

        Oh I also have one MacBook running MacOS because Apple decided to only allow iOS development and parental controls, of all things, on Apple devices running Apple software.

        Yes MS and Apple suck but it’s not as simple as “just switch.”

      • Uprise42@artemis.camp
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        The overwhelming majority of people who work on a computer are stuck with windows.

        Another mass majority of people will buy a computer and use whatever is on it. They aren’t tech savvy enough to switch OS’s and they know how to use it because they use it for work.

        You want more people on Linux? Get more companies to switch to Linux and get more box stores like Walmart and Best Buy to stock Linux OS’s on PC’s at sale.

        Linux growth right now will be slow. It will still happen, but it’s not going to be fast. Steam released the steam deck which runs Linux and the OS saw a MAJOR spike in users. That’s because a device is being sold with Linux stock on it. Now do the same with laptops. Some will say desktops, but desktops aren’t as popular as laptops. It won’t hurt to package with desktops but laptops are key to that.

        • rivalary@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Honestly, I would like more people using it as support from companies would improve and my experience would get better, and competition breeds innovation. But I’m not going to push for it. I’m happy with what it does for me and I don’t really care if other people use it or not. I just get annoyed when people complain without wanting to hear about solutions or alternatives. I know people who complain because they are chronic complainers and they are not interested in actually fixing any of their problems.

    • SkyeStarfall
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      What else would be the answer, then? Windows is a commercial product by Microsoft. They will never get better unless forced to. They will keep getting worse for profit because, well, that’s what they do.

      The whole point about an open-source operating system is that you can make it yours, and nobody can take that away from you. And the more people use linux, the better it gets. Commercial closed sources products can never have the same qualities.