• Snot Flickerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    133
    ·
    5 days ago

    I mean, the whole point of the show is a critique on fascism.

    It’s definitely already outstayed its welcome in the USA.

  • Default_Defect@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    4 days ago

    He’s probably been approached by one too many chuds that worship their idea of Homelander and that think he is his character.

      • Klear@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 days ago

        I lost interest during season 2 because it was just too on the nose and obvious, which is odd given that the Ennis original (which I love dearly) is about as unsubtle as you can get.

        The other issue was I felt like they largely threw the anti-corporation themes out of the window in favour of making it a superhero show.

        I loved the first season, but the way it was evolving in the second just didn’t sit well with me.

          • prole
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            I think “because reasons” is a pretty absurd reduction lol

  • Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    looking at supernatural, kripkes other creation. when the 2 new showrunners took over, it became nothing more than fan/slashfiction for fans who becames extremely obsessed with the characthers.

  • venotic@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 days ago

    I believe a show should only run as long as its story warrants it for. Some shows can go however long it wants because it creates its own stories on the go like Doctor Who or Star Trek so they’re going to have many series and seasons. But shows like Dexter that start going off its hinges and falls apart because of it going for too long because it had no direction and its story could already be pin-pointed as to when it ends. Those kinds of shows shouldn’t be going on at any rate.

    If you don’t have the creative prowess to keep a show going, tell its story and be done with it.

  • Lucky_777@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    Homelander kills the shows version of “Trump”, then takes complete power. As his first act as president he puts tariffs on the world.

      • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Damn moreso when you realize they’re all an extension of eachother in spirit. GA rose from the ashes of ER, etc.

        The joke has always been there needs to be a primetime medical drama at all times.

  • CallateCoyote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Agreed entirely. A show should last only as long as it takes to tell its story. 2-3 seasons is fine. Hell, even limited one season shows are great.

    • dumblederp@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      It wont. It’s like squeezing an orange, the first few seasons got all the $juice$ now they’re wringing a dry husk with tired writers. May as well get Matt Parker and Trey Stone in to wrap up the show at this point.

      • Alpha71@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        May as well get Matt Parker and Trey Stone in to wrap up the show at this point.

        That would actually be awesome!

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Honestly, it outstayed it’s welcome in the final episode of the first season for me.

    I don’t know sense the fuck the producers have against the story, but fucking or off that far was a waste. They could have just made up their own show and not wasted the money getting the title from Ennis, if they were going to fuck with the core motivation of a central character like that.

    Edit:

    I have no fucking clue why everyone is all het up and nasty about this I’m not saying people can’t enjoy the show, I’m just expressing my opinion, and for some reason people are acting very unpleasant for lemmy.

    It’s disappointing considering I was very recently arguing that lemmy is unusually respectful of differing opinions. I’m not sure if it’s this community that’s being hit with unusual incivility, if it’s the influx of reddit users not getting that we can be decent to each other while disagreeing, or what.

    But, people, remember the human.

      • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 days ago

        Eh, I’m not talking about the quality of the show or comics.

        Ennis is pretty well known for having neat ideas and then pissing all over them with hack dialogue and over doing shock scenes. So it wouldn’t be hard at all to improve that kind of stuff. And the show had incredible production value, with vastly improved dialogue overall.

        But one of the things that way too many adaptations get wrong is fucking with the characters. Butcher, his whole story is his drive to fuck every super in the ass (metaphorically) because of what happened to his wife.

        Then, they undid that entire idea at the end of the first season, but kept trying to make Butcher the same guy, with the same behaviors. That’s a complete failure to make use of the best parts of what Ennis wrote. The characters, and the core ideas, that’s what Ennis is good at.

        They had already kinda shifted Huey a good bit via making him american, but they kept his motivation, the core of him. Then they just said “fuck it” and basically mangled Butcher’s entire arc.

        Like, why bother paying for the rights if you’re not going to use the good parts of it?

        Same thing happened with Preacher. They dumped a ton of money and time into making a slick, well crafted show, but completely undid the characters motivations and personalities in a single scene.

        Ennis may be a hack, but fuck, just do something original if you aren’t going to really adapt what matters most.

        • Klear@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          Devil’s advocate: it’s a good thing to change things up a bit in an adaptation, both to keep old fans on their toes and maybe come up with new ideas and interpretations.

          I had a similar reaction to the s1 ending but I was going to give them the benefit of the doubt that they have some idea of how to work with this.

          My big issue came a bit later, when they had Homelander kill Stillwell. To me the main point of the comics was that all the capes were ultimately a non-issue, a theatre. Stilwell was THE most dangerous, evil and scary character, personifying Vogue.

          And they replaced him (her, I guess) basically with some comic relief idiots afterwards.

          • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            I’m actually okay with changes, when they don’t mess up the “spirit” of the characters, and don’t totally blow apart a plot

            But, yeah, Stillwell, that’s such a horrible choice to kill him off at all, much less that way. I had quit watching, but you pick up bits and pieces anyway, and hearing that had made me glad I had already stopped

        • njm1314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          Man I read those Comics they were garbage. Even pretending that the characters had depth to them in the comics is absurd. The show added so much more depth and interesting aspects to the characters than those stupid Comics did. They were legit bad. The only good part in the comic was the overall world. The show added everything that’s special about the concept.

          • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 days ago

            Which is not the point.

            The point is that they wasted money on the source material when they could have just done their own thing instead.

            • njm1314@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              Yeah there’s a lot of times that sentiment is true. This is not one of those times. This isn’t someone taking a story and bastardizing it to make a different story. This is people with creative ability taking a story that’s like an inch deep and adding everything to it. It’s not that they’re telling a different story, it’s that they’re telling the story that Garth Ennis should have told if he wasn’t as shit writer.

              Like I said there’s only one interesting thing about the comics and that’s the general concept. The overall world. So that’s what they’re really using when they bought that rights to it, the only worthwhile part of it. Even then they added a lot of the depth to that too.

              • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 days ago

                I mean, you’re welcome to that opinion, but it still isn’t the same thing I’m talking about because what I’m saying is that it doesn’t matter how good or bad either version is at all.

                See, when a production company buys or options an IP, they aren’t doing it blind. They’re partially paying for the established fan base.

                Once you step far enough away from what made those people fans in the first place, again regardless of quality, the less value that IP still has because it isn’t the same thing at all.

                I get it, you don’t like Ennis as a writer at all, no big. I think he’s kinda mid overall, an idea man with meh to poor execution over the run of most of his arcs. He’s bad at taking established characters and writing them, but his own are consistent. Yes, consistently hammy and overwrought, but that’s actually harder than it seems.

                But, again, that has nothing to do with the concept of adapting an established property and scrubbing it being shitty. Doesn’t matter how well you do it, it’s a waste.

                Those writers for the show could have come up with some kind of show on their own instead of being given the sorry job of retreading someone else’s work. It doesn’t matter if the end result was fight club or queen of the damned, once you start abandoning core pieces of the work, you’re wasting resources, and insulting the people you’re counting on to be your initial audience.

                It’s like the live action disney shit. The same time, effort, and money could have gone into something original. But, in this case, the production company started with something they didn’t already own.

                • njm1314@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  You keep saying that it’s beside the point. It’s not. I get your point. It’s not an overly novel argument. I’ve made the exact same argument multiple times. It’s a very commonly made argument. I get it. 100%. Nothing about what you’re saying is a mystery to me whatsoever.

                  What I’m saying is it doesn’t apply to this scenario. This is not people taking an IP and pushing Their Own Story into it. This is people taking an IP and expanding it to degree to which the incompetent original author wasn’t capable of. It’s in no way like live action Disney at all. Not even remotely. They put so much more effort and Care into this story then the original author ever did. Than he’s ever capable of. This is creative people taking a concept and fulfilling it. They’re not scrubbing the work they’re finishing it. Do you see what I’m saying?

                  To put it in comic terms, all Garth Ennis did was the rough sketch. Not even the draft before it’s colored, but the very first roughest sketch available. The show did everything else. The story the show tells for the most part is there in his book, almost all of the story elements the show tells originate in the book, he just never bothered to fulfill it or expand upon it. Or even considered it at all really. Because he’s a cringe-worthy loser who didn’t actually want to write anything meaningful or impactful.

    • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      I mean Sam and Dean could have gone on for another 10 years and I wouldn’t have complained.

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      I love the first two seasons of Severance, but even if the third will be bad, it won’t affect my feelings towards the first two.

      Unless it’s GoT season 8 levels of bad, but that’s probably not possible.

    • prole
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Why? I feel like people are looking for reasons to be disappointed with that show. It’s bizarre.

      • GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Because every popular show gets milked to death and executives start interjecting stupid ideas and ruin it. They already had a filler episode in season 2.

        • prole
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          It’s not a filler episode just because it doesn’t include the main characters. The episode where Cobel goes home provided a shit ton of context and back story. For example, ether mines? Everyone in the town huffing ether and in some bizarre capitalist cult that used child labor? The fuck? That just made me want to know more about all of that shit.

          How/why is that filler? Unless I’m wrong about which episode you’re referring to, which I doubt.

          • GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            It was five minutes worth of content stretched into 45 minutes. It was boring af. We learned that she designed something, but other than that, we didn’t really get anything out of it.

            • prole
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              So you know where the series is going then? Because that would be the only way to know that nothing else in that episode will be relevant.

              This is why American media is going down the toilet. You can’t have a single episode dedicated to providing context and character building without chuds whining about it being “boring.” Grow up.

                • prole
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  Maybe try putting your phone away and watching it again.

                  Perhaps it’s just because I was paying attention to the dialogue, and I know what ether is, but I thought the episode was just fine. I wouldn’t submit it for an Emmy or anything, but episodes like this can end up being really important to understanding the plot of a show.