• makyo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    3 days ago

    Can we insist that he put his money where his mouth is and be the first of his own victims er I mean test subjects

    • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      My favorite is Barry Marshall. He thought there was a connection between bacteria and ulcers, which was an unpopular opinion at the time. So he intentionally drank the offending bacteria, got sick as expected, and then people believed him.

      More here, including (which I didn’t know until now) cardiac catheterization.

      I’m sure better sources exist but https://www.discovermagazine.com/health/these-five-doctors-experimented-on-themselves-and-made-big-breakthroughs

      • Fredthefishlord
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        If we allow animal experimentation it’s only fair to also allow human experimentation

        • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Only on consenting adults who have the ability to reasonably reject the offer (so they’re not forced into it for any reason, like money). The guy in the picture did it on babies, so… if you want to do it on yourself go ham, but that wouldn’t be fair. Animal experimentation is bad enough.

      • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        My understanding is that there were known, safe and effective alternatives already and that there is not guarantee what he did actually did anything or that it didn’t cause some unknown harm.