San Francisco’s police union says a city bakery chain has a “bigoted” policy of not serving uniformed cops.

The San Francisco Police Officers Assn. wrote in a social media post last week that Reem’s California “will not serve anyone armed and in uniform” and that includes “members of the U.S. Military.” The union is demanding that the chain “own” its policy.

Reem’s says, however, its policy isn’t against serving armed police officers. It’s against allowing guns inside its businesses.

  • smattering82@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Bring on the down votes but my opinion is this will only make things worse. I think people should judge the police on a officer to officer basis. I work in public service and the majority of cops are really decent people who are trying to help. There are always bad seeds. Even if a cop is on a power trip if you ask them they will help you.

    In my opinion the biggest problem w the police isn’t the officers it’s the training and culture. They have their hands tied w ridiculous use of force policies and almost no training. But bring on the hate and call me a fascist.

    Edit: biblical service to public service. Jesus has no place in these streets.

    • dtc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 year ago

      You know every time I’ve had something stolen and filed a police report I have not even once had my stolen shit returned. They don’t even call back after weeks to say “hey we didn’t care enough to follow any leads, good luck”.

      And yet they take every fucking chance they can to write my as many moving violations as possible, whether or not they apply.

      The police don’t serve the people, never have.

        • MajorJimmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fuck the officer for going along with it. They can quit and find a different job that doesn’t make them out to be a piece of shit like the rest of us. Nobody forces them to become a cop, but by choosing to become one, they’ve branded themselves as part of that fucked up system. That’s on them. ACAB

            • abraxas@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Considering studies show dollar-for-dollar we can effectively do what good police do by putting their budget money in other services (mental health, welfare, etc), I’m ok with having a LOT fewer cops with a lot more limited mandate.

              • smattering82@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                So this way not only will petty crimes not get solved but the bigger crimes will also go unsolved.

                • abraxas@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Honestly, I’m not super married to the idea of “solving” crimes. I would rather prevent 1 crime than solve 2. The idea that solving crimes is more important than preventing them only works for the punitive model of justice, one that I do not ascribe to.

                  If we could cut the crime rate 90%, but the people who committed crimes went free, I’d still strongly consider it.

                  That’s despite the fact I don’t agree that big crimes wouldn’t get solved. Of over 650,000 police officers, only 10,000 are detectives, who are trained and tasked with solving crimes. That’s a LOT of cops that solve crimes for a living at all. They “keep peace”. Sometimes you DO need a cop to keep peace, when the most important thing is the presence of mitigating force. The rest of the time, a social worker is more effective.

                  • smattering82@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    What do you do for work, and how much time do you spend in depressed areas? I have seen babies shaken to death mothers cutting their wrists while their children are in the next room, people placing gasoline bombs in banks around town, a guy set his ex wife’s house on fire with her in it, a guy shot in the stomach for the cash in his register, a pregnant woman stabbed in the belly 9 times by a stalker abd Countless other awful things and for these reasons I am glad cops are working. Obviously there are douche bags. But the real world is really hard and at times evil. So without police and the idea of punishment I think it would be chaotic. There has to be a better way to deliver public safety and I am on board with it but for now it’s better than nothing.

    • VentraSqwal@links.dartboard.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Even if a cop is on a power trip if you ask them they will help you.

      I was with you until about here. I’ve seen cops shoo away people in need rather than even deign to give directions. I would say the majority I’ve seen have been very unhelpful and the encounters that have been nice or cordial have been the extreme minority. It’s like their default is power trip mode.

      • smattering82@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yea I was too broad there when I said that However in my own experience I have seen even SOME -asshole cops be helpful.

        • chinpokomon@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think that part of the problem with your response, not just biblical vs public service, is that it is a bias based on your own experience.

          Like the rest of us, the police are overworked, and it is reasonable to expect that they feel pressure to act and do, not to take time to reason and consider. For an office worker, they might get angry and have a short fuse. For an officer, that might have dire consequences.

          What purpose do the police serve? In my youth, they helped get baby kittens down from trees. The officer with the glowing smile would hand the kitten to the little girl who needed help. The highly legible and large typeface said “Cop gave cat.” Factual and warming.

          This isn’t the interaction I usually have and it isn’t the interaction I’ve heard others have. Was Timmy and Suzy’s Big Day wrong? Consider the difference between The Andy Griffith Show and Dragnet. It’s a big difference when you know the people you are there to “Protect and Serve,” but reality is considerably different for most.

          On the other side of things, you have folks that have been underprivileged from the crib. Social pressures indirectly, if not sometimes directly, perpetuate their plight. It instills anger and a general distrust.

          Now mix those groups together.

          Grouped by association is going to be the outcome unless people recognize their biases and actively try to work outside that. It means recognizing how your experience might not be shared amongst others. That’s all anyone is asking.

          • smattering82@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yea man I typoed biblical it was supposed to be just public service I don’t believe in god or the Bible.

    • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      I work in biblical service and the majority of cops are really decent people who are trying to help.

      Your inability to see your selection bias and account for it (while claiming to do just that) is beyond staggering.

      Like… you’re saying the words, but then your overall takeaway proves that despite what you’re saying, you have no concept of reality beyond your own lived experience and world view.

      I’m not in the ACAB/Defund camp either by any means, but you should either learn to truly acknowledge your bias (and not just pay it lip service), or just fucking own it and stop pretending to have a nuanced and enlightened opinion.

      Like…don’t try to make yourself sound like you’re speaking from any sort of well reasoned position that accounts for the limitations of personal experience and acknowledges the experience of others. Just say, “Hey, the vast majority of cops I’ve interacted with, I’ve had no problem with. Therefore I think most cops everywhere are decent people and the tiny fraction that aren’t are just an unfortunate and unavoidable, but ultimately acceptable exception that is worth it in exchange for the services police forces as a whole provide for society.”

      Because that’s literally what you’re saying.

      You’re a white guy working and interacting with these cops in a religiously charged setting that already puts you in familiar and friendly territory with them in terms of ideology, race, and gender. These are three huge factors that are all coloring the interaction, and given the closely intertwined threads of American right wing politics with police, religion, race, and gender, every single interaction you’ve had with them benefits from being on their side in all the major categories that matter. With that frame of reference, you cannot possibly (at least while maintaining intellectual honesty) use your own personal experience as being at all broadly representative of that of the average person in the general public.

      It’s like showing up to game day in the home team’s city wearing the home team’s colors and singing the home team’s fight song…and then the next day when you see a story about how many of those fans you met were harassing and assaulting fans of the other team, your response is, “Well I interacted with dozens of those fans and they were all really nice to me. Since I have real experience with them, that proves that they’re nice people who would never do those bad things. Must have just been 1% of bad apples. But overall, there’s no problem with bad fans since they were all nice to me.”

      • smattering82@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Damn you sure are painting with a broad brush. I have been replying to a lot of comments so if you read this reply in another comment sorry. I agree that the police need reform and I agree that it attracts a lot of the wrong type of people. I think their training is lacking in use of force and de escalation tactics. I think they should have more than 2 hrs a year of grappling training and a lot of departments are moving in the right direction.

        I am sorry you have only had dealings with asshole cops because I know a lot of really good ones. Have a great day.

        • Stegget@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Everyone knows a “good” cop. And every one of those good cops has covered up for a bad cop. Which, by default, means there are no “good” cops.

          • Katana314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            And then the corollary; Every so often, there’s a good cop that has stood up to their bad cop neighbors, calling them out publicly for evidence tampering and racial profiling. And then the union kicks them out - making them a good person, but no longer a good cop.

            They do their own filtering. Hence ACAB.

          • smattering82@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I agree with you there too the cops need another layer especially for behavioral or psychological calls. But that’s a training and budget issue. Also I have been to so many crisis intervention calls as a paramedic and was thankful the cops were there because they patted down the pt and they had either a gun or a knife on them. Every municipality is complaining about their budget so I wouldn’t hold your breath waiting for trained social workers thst want to respond to the shelter or nursing home at 4 am for the psych.

    • Ulrich_the_Old@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      How many of the “good cops” turn in the bad cops? Oh none you say… Well you might want to do a recount of good cops then.

      • CertifiedBlackGuy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Y’all remember when NYPD in its entirety said that old man fell during those protests a few years back?

        Then videos got released.

        Judging cops on a department by department basis saves paper ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

        • orclev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          So you’re saying the system is broken? Well, that sounds like something we can agree on then. The police force is broken, needs to be torn down back to its foundations and rebuilt. Every time something happens with police you always get the same response “It’s just a few bad apples”, conveniently leaving out the rest of that phrase “that ruin the bunch”. Well, those bad apples have been left too long, and it ruined all of them. There are only two kinds of cops, the bad apples, and the ruined apples, both need to be thrown out. We need to abolish the current police and replace them with a uncorrupted version, the rot has set in too far in the existing police force, there’s no salvaging it.

    • Rilichu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      In my opinion the biggest problem w the police isn’t the officers it’s the training and culture.

      That’s sorta the point that people generally have issues with cops dude. It’s the overall culture of shielding of each other from consequences, stoking a “everyone is your enemy”/warrior mentality among officers, bad or lack of training leading to unneeded violent escalation etc.

      It’s been police departments dragging their heels and throwing tantrums on addressing these issues that have what caused people’s dislike of them to grow.

      • abraxas@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ll throw my support behind cops who are standing up to the bullshit.

        But they are usually fired (or worse), which means the people I’m supporting… aren’t cops anymore

      • smattering82@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yea I have been saying that the entire time and getting downvoted to hell. My opinion is one of the big problems are cops don’t think of themselves as part of the community so by kicking them out of restaurants will only make them feel like less of a part of the community. I am done responding to these comments everyone seems to be a expert lawyer and city planner that has extensive experience dealing w the public.

        • zbyte64
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I would say they don’t feel part of the community because they are the enforcement behind alienation under capitalism. If everyone has housing, security, fair trials, etc then people wouldn’t perceive them as part of an alienating force.

    • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s fine to have a different opinion and you shouldn’t be downvoted. If you’ve had that experience of them it’s perfectly valid. There’s just a lot of cops who are secret white supremacists who get outed routinely and that’s genuinely scary. Cops should get a lot more education than they do in the US.

    • BeautifulMind ♾️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      my opinion is this (rejecting cops) will only make things worse.

      Giving them the benefit of the doubt because if you don’t they will punish you isn’t really giving them the benefit of the doubt, it is a backhanded acknowledgement that if they are not collectively appeased and given unwarranted grace, they will behave badly.

      That’s not an argument that they’re not bullies, it sounds like an acknowledgement that they’re bullies and it would be better to appease them

      • smattering82@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        After the amadou diallo shooting the NYPD knee jerk response was to increase the trigger pull pressure of their pistols so it would be harder to pull the trigger. So instead of better training and use of force tactics they just made it harder to shoot. And that in turn makes it easier to miss and hit bystanders. A perfect example of the terrible policy to breeds bad cops.