"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 个月前Horrorlemmy.worldimagemessage-square103linkfedilinkarrow-up11.13K
arrow-up11.13KimageHorrorlemmy.world"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 个月前message-square103linkfedilink
minus-squareNoobnarski@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 个月前I’m pretty sure scientists back then could have told you that these balloons are too small. The person(s) who drew that picture most likely wasn’t a scientist, which is why it looks how it looks.
minus-squareMeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 个月前Maybe they thought we’d have discovered/created new elements by now that could do this.
minus-squareexplodicle@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 个月前Half hydrogen! Or the rare molecule, puffy air.
minus-squareAdrianTheFrog@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 个月前Well, if we used a pure vacuum, you’d only get about 17% more efficiency than just using helium I think
I’m pretty sure scientists back then could have told you that these balloons are too small. The person(s) who drew that picture most likely wasn’t a scientist, which is why it looks how it looks.
Maybe they thought we’d have discovered/created new elements by now that could do this.
Half hydrogen! Or the rare molecule, puffy air.
Well, if we used a pure vacuum, you’d only get about 17% more efficiency than just using helium I think