• neidu3@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    “It does in fact run Doom”, he said before he snorted a line of his new favorite drug - a dark grey line of Megaflops.

    Wear your N95 around the next gen SoCs. We don’t know the effects of inhaling them (yet)

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    In broad terms, that seems to put it about on par with an Intel 386 chip from 1985

    At 24 MHz, it’s actually about 4-6 times faster than a full fledged 33 MHz i80386DX with 10 times as many transistors back in the day.
    It’s absolutely insane that i386 remained the standard with its inferior high latency design.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acorn_Archimedes

    exhibiting BASIC language performance ten times faster than a newly introduced 80386-based computer

    That was an 8MHz Arm system, and it was commonly recognized as being clearly faster than a 33MHz i80386DX!
    In fact the 8036 was so inefficient at 33MHz it couldn’t even beat the speed of a 16 MHz 80286 on 16 bit code!!
    Mips, Alpha, Motorola, Sparc and finally Arm were all better, but they weren’t backed by IBM, and the availability of clones made the PC relatively cheap. But basically everything else was better than Intel.

    Unfortunately Arm also lacked a math co-processor, so for tasks that were heavy on FP calculations, an i386 with co-processor was superior.
    Also Arm was unable to sell them cheap enough to capture at least a niche market. (Apart from education in UK)
    And for the hobbyist an Amiga was way cheaper, and had powerful graphics and sound chips.

    • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      Thank you. This kind of information was exactly what I wanted in the comments.

      As a person who started on a 286 this seems blazing fast. Just wish it had ports for power, HDMI and USB

    • Dayroom7485@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 days ago

      I want those fuckers powering little submarines that fight cancer cells right now - but realistically speaking, these microcontrollers would need to be at least one order two order of magnitude smaller for that, no?

  • notgold@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    Just nuts that my 386 was to big to take on my pushy as a kid and now the same thing would get lost in my nose hairs

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      3 days ago

      Same way you would in any other microcontroller application, but smaller, so the whole device can be smaller.

      Get small enough and we can really have those bloodstream robots.

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      You could use it as the logic board for a micro drone, something the size of a dime perhaps. Or other applications where weight or space are extremely limited. Another example might be a medical implant of some sort, this is small enough that it could be a part of a device that is meant to be placed inside an artery, or an eyeball, or an ear canal.

    • Lumberjacked@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      I make specialty vehicle electronics. My immediate thought was very small and cheap sensors. Similar to tire pressure monitoring but wired with CAN or something similar.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      In small things. Probably not very feasible for hobby projects unless you can get it soldered on when the PCB is built.