• loaf@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    ·
    2 months ago

    I quit. American politics are a circus sideshow full of dancing turds. At this point, let it burn. The side that I vote for won’t even stand up against this shit, so what good is my vote now?

    Just a bunch of rich assholes doing whatever they want.

      • loaf@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m just so disappointed in the fact that there are so many people in this country that actually voted for this shit. How can people sell themselves out like that, just to be able to say, “I owned the libs loool”

        I don’t even know what to think anymore.

        • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 months ago

          Cmon, they cheated. We all know it. Even they know it. And by not addressing it and shining a light on it, Democrats are INVITING them to do it again in 2026 and 2028. In 2028, HitlerPig will win his unConstitutional reelection with 98% of the vote, and use that “overwhelming popularity” to justify ignoring the Constitutional prohibition against a third term.

        • Caedarai@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s to do with where people stand. Most people in the US, despite their rhetoric, would be more centrist than many people realize (and between both major parties). That means most aren’t in agreement with much of what Trump is doing internationally or with respect to Musk/DOGE in application, though most might support broad ideas of ‘putting the US first’, ‘reducing the size/cost of the US government’, ‘stopping illegal immigration/deporting illegal immigrants’ etc. But crucially, this also means that most eligible voters are also right of the vocal elements of the left that play up political correctness, identity politics, and social economic policy (economic policy further left-wing than what we see at the moment). So in an election, if neither side really aligns with the majority of voters, it’s easy to see how voters can be swayed by voting against the current party in power, voting due to marketing/propaganda, or voting against the party that seems most radical in ways that differ from voters’ ideas/interests. Trump didn’t campaign on annexing Canada, or invading Greenland, but he did campaign on deporting illegal immigrants and reducing the size of government. And many people saw Harris as a continuation of Biden but with a more socially liberal (or further left on this) attitude and a stronger association with identity politics. So if Trump in his first term didn’t do much that most people would consider lasting harm (despite his antics and buffoonery) and campaigned on ideas that the majority agree with, whereas Harris was a continuation of an unpopular presidency/government (at least at the end) but with a flair of things that most people don’t align with, well, the result speaks for itself: a landslide in the electoral college. The only way forward for democrats is to capitalise on the mistakes Trump is making (unpopular decisions and attitudes), to seem reasonable and grounded to the majority, and to not veer off and start pushing for social issues most of the voting center doesn’t really buy (so for example focus on creating a better immigration system and treating immigrants fairly, but not legalising illegal immigrants. Or pushing for general social protections, workers’ rights, consumer rights, better and broader healthcare coverage and business regulation without straying into a focus on minority rights, trans terminology battles, antireligious discourse or attacking tradionalists/older folks’ viewpoints.) If you can win the center you can win the election. And you do that by appealing to the traditional center (and definitely not by antagonising it).

          • PyroNeurosis
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Lemme get this straight: you say the Democratic party’s policy of espousing a conservative approach on the issues of the day (immigration needs controlling, trans kids bad, Israel a-ok, etc) to peel voters from the Republican party was not only a good plan, but the only course of action they could reasonably take to win the election?

            • Caedarai@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              The Democratic party doesn’t need to espouse any of that, it just needs to be less belligerent about opposing the issues since they’re issues where the party’s stance isn’t quite shared by the majority of the population. If you remove the stumbling blocks for voters, and instead focus attention on where the party shares its views with the majority of the US population, then wouldn’t it be natural that more of the center would shift your way?

          • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            But crucially, this also means that most eligible voters are also right of the vocal elements of the left that play up political correctness, identity politics, and social economic policy (economic policy further left-wing than what we see at the moment).

            The evidence does not support this, it in fact supports the opposite conclusion.

            I think you need to think long and hard about why your perception is so confidently and boldly at odds with reality.

    • FreeRangeMustard@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Come to Europe. We got ice cream and free healthcare. Also you don’t need a gun to protect yourself when going out for a walk.

      • littlebrother@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think those of us who want to leave cant…

        I mean I KNOW I’m fucked, I’d save my wife…but who would accept us? Likely not one single European nation.

        • Master@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          2 months ago

          All of them will if you have a million in the bank… If not then its a long hard road.

            • FreeRangeMustard@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              Don’t need to be exactly rich.

              What are the obstacles to taking this step? Is it only a financial matter? What is you and your wife’s profession? You can pm me if you want to.

              • littlebrother@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                2 months ago

                Unfortunately internet stranger. I cannot divulge my information, my wife’s a tech teacher and I’m screwed. It’s about it.

            • tamal3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 months ago

              I’m a middle school teacher and my partner builds houses. What country in Europe will take us? It’s a nice thought, but no one will accept us.

              • lost_faith@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                2 months ago

                A little closer than Europe, Canada needs both. Depending on age and some other factors it shouldn’t be too hard, tho it is not easy. Just don’t choose Quebec or New Brunswick if you don’t speak french

                Here is a link to our Express Entry

              • Zedd @lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 months ago

                Albania. It’s nice here. There’s a construction worker shortage, and no shortage of jobs for teachers that speak English. You can even show up and hang out for up to a year with no visa.

                • Caedarai@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I really doubt moving to a place like Albania, with far, far lower salaries, a massive language barrier, and a plethora of internal problems would be considered an improvement by most of the US citizens here.

              • FreeRangeMustard@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                Teachers and construction workers are always welcome. The teaching part could be a problem because of the language and licenses, but maybe a state were English is a more common language.

        • MooseyMoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m disabled and autistic with no work history but menial jobs that I couldn’t do for more than a year before massive burnout. I’m sure that some country somewhere would want me, right? I can play the guitar for a few minutes before my messed up hands hurt too much.

          Kinda ready for the extermination camps, tbh.

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s why the American people have to do it themselves. Take to the streets. The system has failed you. No one will save you but yourselves.

  • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    2 months ago

    Just for the record, this is what democrats always do, and it’s why they keep fucking losing.

    Democrats would rather have trump than have a social-democratic platform, and it shows every time they have the opportunity to fight him and chose to capitulate instead. The democrats aren’t a left-wing party, certainly not now, and arguably not since FDR.

    • demizerone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      There is always a few Democrats to fuck shit up. This time there were 10! I hope to see the day where Shumer and Fetterman both fuck off into the sunset.

    • yarr@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      The problem is, both parties serve someone, and it’s not the common man. The Republican party is a lot more effective at maintaining the illusion – look at how many of their constituents consistently vote against their own interests and are proud to do so.

      There’s people working for Federal agencies RIGHT NOW that have either already been terminated or are on the rocks and they are STILL Trump supporters. They are willing to destroy their own lives just to “own the libs” and it will be interesting to see how far this trend will be taken.

  • TemplaerDude@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    2 months ago

    Do-nothing Democrats strike again.

    Schumer is a coward and a fraud. The weakest leader in a generation. He should resign in shame.

          • bearboiblake@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            if it’s not homophobia, can you explain why “sucking dick” and “getting railed” are implied to be embarrassing or otherwise “bad” things for a guy to do?

            • SippyCup@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              2 months ago

              I’d have said, and have said the same for Pelosi.

              The implication being that he’s their bitch. He’d take any shitty deal they threw at him because he’s Daddy’s good little representative.

              Frankly y’all sound like you came straight from Twitter the way you jumped on the most offensive interpretation you could think of and ran with it.

                • VanillaFrosty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  It’s wild. Chin up though, I’ve been to quite a lot of demonstrations this last month and it’s getting more and more promising. I even got my Joe Rogan worshipping fuck of a co-worker to attended the veterans marches last Friday, so the more sane ones are waking up.

                  Arm yourself. Find community. Resist.

              • bearboiblake@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                “hah, checkmate, i also would have been sexist” isn’t the slam dunk defense you seem to think it is

                • SippyCup@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I didn’t think it was. I made a crass joke, I know what I said. You’re virtue signaling, very liberal of you.

              • bearboiblake@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 months ago

                what the fuck are you talking about? i am not even american, let alone a democrat? stop using the dumbest fucking justification for homophobia i have ever heard. stop the bigotry or fuck off back to reddit.

              • bearboiblake@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                I saw your reply before it got deleted by the moderator. You are every bit as hateful as a Trump voter. It’s people like you who will gladly watch as LGBTQ+ people get systematically rounded up and put in camps.

              • Caedarai@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                At this rate, maybe AOC or similar will become the democratic candidate in 2028, and basically lead to another Republican landslide. Democrats, at least the politically active ones that would sway these things (not leadership), keep putting a large emphasis on identity politics, political correctness, and a certain ‘victim’ ideology which is out of touch with many of the centrists who ultimately decide the election. Kamela Harris, despite her shifts in policy, is a gauge of this, and yet in these areas she and AOC are nowhere even close, but the AOC-type group is where I see the biggest push among younger democrats. From the point of view of winning a general election, this could be concerning for democrats.

                • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  AOC wouldn’t be a Republican Landslide what are you… reads the rest of it

                  Ahh… you’re one of those “Democrats need to crucify transpeople in the street in order to prove they love America” weirdos

                  Sorry Concern Troll, but I’m not buying it

            • Anomaline@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              Agreed. Unfortunately, Lemmy also took a step back to 2010s reddit when it comes to tolerance and self-analysis too, apparently. Schumer is terrible but he’s terrible in a way that doesn’t have to be articulated as a slightly elaborated version of “that’s gay”

            • VanillaFrosty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Brother, sister, or other in the current context it’s a clear joke to show who is the “Dominant” and who is the “submissive”. If you understand current social dynamics, youd know that. Now we can have a conversation on if that’s appropriate considering the view is shaped by human histories use of rape as a weapon, especially when subjecting others, but that’s getting so unnecessarily deep. I can just understand this is a joke using modern social dynamics.

              Also, I’m Bi. I’ve been with two guys throughout my years. Or do I get to have another conversation on how I’m not actually gay?

              • bearboiblake@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                …i know? obviously it’s that, nobody was debating that fact. my point is that the automatic agreement that having sex with men makes you submissive is inherently homophobic.

                imagine if instead if the insult was like, “he’s such a woman, i bet he loves cooking, cleaning and looking after republicans!”, I imagine you’d correctly interpret the sexism in there. the original message was homophobic in the same way.

                and i don’t care how gay you are or aren’t, you have zero authority to tell people that they’re not allowed to find something discriminatory

                • VanillaFrosty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  I mean yeah, that would get the same point across? The specific use of the word woman makes that sexist. So your example is disingenuous. At no time did op call Schumer gay.

                  Leave out the woman part and it is the same joke, with the same implications, but no sexism. Much like there is no homophobia in the original joke. Understanding social norms and implications isn’t homophobic.

                  I have every authority to tell you what I find discriminatory. You’re welcome to tell me you feel insulted by what I say, and if we were actually in the real world I would be sure to avoid such jokes around you (if we interacted on a consistent basis). But I’m my circle, this is a nothing burger.

                  It’s like a Trump supporter would get offended when you make fun of Trump’s tiny hands. Should we do our best to avoid offendeding them? Or are there certain people it’s ok to offend?

                  Maybe we avoid making the joke because it might offended people with tiny hands? The joke works because it bothers Trump, not because there is anything with tiny hands. But hey just because some people might get upset it’s not an ok joke to use.

                  This is the Internet. This is a melting pot of different people. I’m not gonna tailor every joke and every response to your sensibilities, or anyone else’s. Grow up.

    • straightjorkin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      Rumor is that he’s doing it because he has a book tour starting tomorrow and if there’s a shut down he can’t go. Fucking cretin.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    2 months ago

    Schumer is a traitor, capitulator and collaborator.

    his response to ice literally kidnapping a man for speech was three paragraphs of “oh yeah totally fuck him hate how fucking Arab he is” before finally saying “but this might be a little bit wrong? uwu” and asking for reasons rather than fucking demanding he be released immediately.

    Chuck “blackbagging might be wrong” Schumer. between him and Amy I wonder how much worse a family can get.

    fascist collaborator piece of shit.

  • F_OFF_Reddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    2 months ago

    Big surprise, old suits in the democratic party don’t represent the modern democratic voter.

    There needs to be term limits, especially based on age, and to whipe out any form of stock trading and “donations”.

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Perfect encapsulation of the state of the Dem leadership:

    “Chuck Schumer caving and saying he’ll vote for a blank check for Trump and Musk is demonstrative of why Democrats lose,” lamented progressive activist and writer Jonathan Cohn. “Voters so often don’t believe what they [Dem leadership] say because they don’t believe what they say.”

    (Emphasis and clarification in brackets mine)

    • Hoomod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      2 months ago

      Literally less than 24 hours after saying democrats wouldn’t support the CR

      Absolutely pathetic

  • WorkersCorps@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    2 months ago

    The entire Democratic Party leadership needs to resign and be replaced by people who will actually fight for working Americans.

    In November Schumer and the other leaders suffered the worst defeat in party history yet they haven’t realized the only thing left for them to do is resign in shame.

        • Cgers@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 months ago

          Ok but this isn’t what I voted for last November and I’m quickly running out of reasons to vote ever again until these dumb fucks actually do something to oppose him. Might as well let the fascists have all the seats, the Dems only apparent purpose right now is to further legitimize trumps unconstitutionality.

          • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I swear if Gavin fucking Newsom gets the nomination, I’ll take my chances with Vance… And that’s not a compliment at Vance, Gavin’s just THAT openly transphobic that Vance looks like a good person BY COMPARISON, I know they’re both transphobes.

            God… a situation where I’d support Vance, are things really getting that bad

            Course if it’s Trump Jr. I’m going to try to grab a ballot, only to throw up all over it… That apple hasn’t fallen from the tree, somehow it’s floating over it

            Walz however, I can live with and vote for willingly without a gun to my head.

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t know why you are picking fights and letting a faceless, random Internet stranger live rent free in your mind. The centrist Democrats/liberals are tone deaf. There is no getting through to them other than their value of private property, free market and stocks. If those things are even nudged, they will immediately side with fascists and make up some circular logic of excuses, instead of admitting what they truly value for siding with fascists.

  • oakey66@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    2 months ago

    Call your democratic rep and demand that they insist Schumer resign.

    (202) 224-3121

    At this point, I am Not donating a single dollar more to the party. I won’t vote for a democrat at the top of the ticket and will pick a DSA candidate or green candidate. If the democrats aren’t willing to fight for democracy or strengthen it when they’re in power, I won’t reward them with votes.

    Every democrat senator needs to be primaried.

    • 0ops@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Me neither. I’m done. They have until midterms to change my mind.

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      So we yell at someone who yells at someone who then says “No.” and then we’re back where we started.

      Plus my democratic Senator has brain damage and I have no democratic representative.