• NotLemming@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’m gonna do a morris dance for more losses. Let’s bankrupt them all before the summer solstice.

    • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The loss is mostly even to the gains after trump was elected. It shot up like 80% after the election and is now back down to its October level, and it’s not like the October level was sane.

  • JOMusic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Almost 50% of a company’s worth gone in 2 months. Tesla really is leading the race.

  • b161
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Touching grass isn’t enough. I need bad things to happen to evil men in power.

  • Zacryon@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Ahw yes. Bleed those fuckers dry.

    I fear this will only be temporary. I really hope this trend continues.

  • Gladaed@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Data is ugly: this does not contextualize gains made in the tail end of the election and upto the inauguration. This miscommunicates the harm done to them. The economical harm must grow.

    • TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Basically there was a completely un justified bubble in the past few months, driving it up to double what it was worth for years.

      • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Tesla was always an unjustified bubble. Even after these losses it has a market cap of ~800B compared to Toyota at 295B. Despite Toyota selling 10.8 million vehicles to Teslas 1.8 million last year. Assuming similar profit per vehicle tesla should be worth ~50B, assuming 3 times the profit, tesla should still max out at ~150B. There’s a long way to drop yet.

  • redlemace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The world does not need (should not have) billionaires. When you have a couple of millions, it’s enough to last you a lifetime.

    • eurisko@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      Français
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Like, you get a golden crown in exchange for the extra wealth, like, congratulations like, good job, like, amazing.

      Now go retire on an island of something.

    • Aux@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 hours ago

      In which fairy tale world do you live that a couple of millions is enough to last a lifetime? Can’t even buy a house here with a couple of mil… And then you’re forgetting about the inflation. A couple of mil is nothing.

      • AnonomousWolf@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Can someone do the math if 2 million is enough to live comfortably? (per adult in the family)

        In most places you can buy a house for half a mil, and just put the trest in stocks and pull a monthly salary

        • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Depends very much on where you live and what counts as comfortable. In Canada one mil basically buys you a crackshack in Vancouver or a older four bedroom out in the country. Retiring with an additional mil in the bank might not be super “comfortable” as in going on regular vacations, affording property taxes and so on…

          But yeah, most places aren’t like that.

          • AnonomousWolf@lemm.eeOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Yea housing in Canada sounds pretty fucked. I live in Amsterdam we have a housing crisis but half a mil can get you a decent place.

            If you put the other 1.5mil in investments and pull 50k per year out as a salary with no mortgage to pay you can probably live quire comfortably for 40 years. (no crazy vacations and stuff)

            Amsterdam is also one of the most expensive cities in the world, so I think with 2mil you’ll live comfortably in most places in the world

        • Aux@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          9 hours ago

          There’s a rule of 4%, meaning that you should not withdraw more than 4% of your investments per year to keep the ball rolling. To cover the US average salary you have to have $1.65m invested. Good luck finding a house for $450k and living without medical insurance.

          If you want to have insurance, then your 4% minimum rises up to $1.875m. And I really don’t think you can buy any house for $125k…

          The problem with people who think that $1-2m is enough is that they were born in the 1980-s or something when $1m was a lot of money. But inflation is a thing and that money is not enough anymore. If you ask me, $10m is a bare minimum today to be set for life and not to worry about finances ever.

          • emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 hours ago

            If you’re withdrawing the average US salary, that would also cover mortgage payments, so you could put the entire 450k down on a more expensive house and still live comfortably. Most people making average salary don’t own their house outright and pay nothing for housing. So yeah, by your calculations 2m is more than enough.

          • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            Good luck finding a house for $450k and living without medical insurance.

            I have to say, thats still a large swath of the US. Also depending on the interest rate, it could be better to have the mortgage rather than bought outright.

            I also know a few folks who do just enough work to get medical insurance, and they really enjoy it that way. They have enough from their investments, and the ~30hr/wk they work is enough to get medical, dental, and vision. One works a horse stable, another worked at Starbucks for a while (when it still seemed like a decent company). At that point, there was enough return from investments that she started her own coffee shop (and brought in a couple other employees from Starbucks she really liked working with).

            $2 million is still plenty for most people.

            Edit:

            Max $450k, 4br, 2ba, sorted by price high to low.

            You can get more for less depending on location, but there you go.

          • Overconfidentiality
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            It really really depends on your standard of living too. This number will be different for everyone. Some would be happy with 125k house, it’s small and nothing fancy, but the 5 bedroom 2 car garage house, not for everyone.

              • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Anywhere outside a major city in the Midwest. If you don’t have to work any more and worry about commute then you can get a decent house in the country.

              • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                An older small house 30+min from a smaller city with some fixing to do.

                Previous crackhouses are more likely to be auctioned or sub 100k in all but the craziest areas.

            • Aux@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              There are a lot of ifs, sure. That’s another reason why a blank statement that $2m is enough is plain wrong.