• TammyTobacco@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    People probably won’t need to yell at them if the Democrats actually are listening to and engaging with the voters.

    • ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 month ago

      Democrats do not listen to or engage with voters. The last time we told them to listen. their response was ‘I’m speaking.’

      • mimavox@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Let go of that crap now. Heckling and interrupting a speech was NOT the right thing to do. Neither was staying home on election day just because Harris didn’t voice the exact right opinion on Gaza. We’re in an infinitely worse situation now.

        • ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Anyone that doesn’t see genocide as a red line isn’t entitled to an opinion on politics. Especially if they claim ‘lesser evil’

        • Seleni@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          It absolutely was the right thing to do. Legitimizing that asshole by respectfully listening while he barks out lies and bullshit and craps all over America is what’s unacceptable.

          Waggling fingers and sternly frowning and politely protesting well out of everyone’s way while not inconveniencing anyone will get us absolutely nowhere.

          • ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Anyone that doesn’t see genocide as a red line isn’t entitled to an opinion on politics. Especially if they claim ‘leser evil’

            • Seleni@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              100%.

              I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to “order” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: “I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action”; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man’s freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a “more convenient season.”

              Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.

              -Martin Luther King Jr

              Been thinking about this quote a lot lately.

    • formulaBonk@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      If they engaged with their voters, we wouldn’t have any democratic representatives over age of 65. Anything past that is just posturing and self enrichment

      Edit: wow I left a generally agreeable comment and fucked off for the day and apparently a lot of people want representatives older than 65? Yet no one can say why that’s a good thing they only bring up Bernie who’s an independent and not a democrat. Some of you don’t know what you want other than to shit on people online and it’s laughable

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        What’s with the ageism? I want Democratic representatives of any age, as long as they have the right policies and they are of sound mind. People over the age of 65 will be just fine with me, thanks.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I want Democratic representatives of any age, as long as they have the right policies

          The party has selected against candidates with the right policies for decades. Any boomer democrat in party leadership isn’t going to have the right policies.

        • formulaBonk@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Sure but age limits are in place in a million different institutions. If it’s not ageism that you can’t run for office when you’re 16 then it’s not ageism when you have an age limit for representatives. My point is representatives should represent the general population and should be able to at least understand the issues of the current age. Meanwhile the aging congress struggles with basic internet understanding so we don’t have regulations that should have been standard since the fucking 90s. It’s 2025 a person who can’t comprehend internet basics like email encryption has 0 chance of making an informed choice on crypto currency or government backdoors and their implications.