• TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    12 小时前

    The first time I heard that many car manufacturers are getting rid of traditional buttons and odometers in favour of touchscreens, I already thought that it is dangerous.

    As always, corporations don’t give af.

    • Calavera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      12 小时前

      I don’t see an issue to have digital odometer because you don’t interact with it

      • JLock17@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 小时前

        Digital is fine for things that don’t need to be touched. Arguably, it’s better.

        • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 小时前

          Separate analog odometers are better, because it’s a single point of failure otherwise. If one breaks, I can still read all other instruments (fuel, engine temp, speed and/or rpm, whichever failed)

      • nieminen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 小时前

        For real, instrument cluster I’m okay having digital. It’s not something I need to touch, usually there’s steering wheel buttons to interact with it.

        Having your whole radio/climate/etc all on one screen with menus and shit is stupid. You can’t just reach over and change a setting without looking. I miss when everything was “analog”. My first car was a 91 mazda rx7, and I knew exactly where every control was, didn’t have to look at anything to operate it.

        • LePoisson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 小时前

          As someone driving a 2009 Mazda 3 - I really appreciate the simple physical controls in the car. Touch screens are a horrible interface for something you could fiddle with an analog version and get feedback without taking your eyes off the road.

          Not saying they shouldn’t exist, they can be helpful and useful for displaying information and navigation, hell even controlling the AC and radio and all that but there should also be a physical interface for basic functions.

          I know my next vehicle will be electric and I definitely will be swayed by the user interface for things. I do hope car companies are listening to everyone saying they don’t want just touch screens and nothing else.

          • Calavera@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 小时前

            I honestly hate to use the central display to control the AC. In my newer car first you have to press a button on the screen to open the AC control, then you have to set what you want.

            On my old one I can do whatever I want without need to look off the road

            • nieminen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 小时前

              I have a 2019 mustang, and it’s kind of a mixed bag. There are a bunch of controls for AC and head in physical controls, but there’s also several you can’t use without the screen (like dual zone temps, and niche things like that)