And you can just as easily fake that data. Unless an image is cryptographicly signed right off the sensor, I wouldn’t put any weight in something being real or fake nowadays. Is this image probably fake, ya, but that’s using common sense not a “fake ai detector”.
afaik AI detectors are no better than random chance
You’d have to be blind to think that’s not AI. The details don’t make any sense and the proportions are just weird.
I’m pretty blind when it comes to these things
For text yeah, for images… well
Once it’s been jpeg a few times probably just as bad but if it’s fresh, they can work
You can embed metadata into images, so there is some efficacy to AI image detectors.
Ai text detectors are snake oil
And you can just as easily fake that data. Unless an image is cryptographicly signed right off the sensor, I wouldn’t put any weight in something being real or fake nowadays. Is this image probably fake, ya, but that’s using common sense not a “fake ai detector”.
For text that’s true, my understanding was that it’s better for photos.