• Vincent@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      There’s always been a risk, but now that risk is actually playing out. It’s a bit smug to pretend that nothing has changed.

      Not to mention that Bert Hubert has been beating this drum for a long time. However, he also sees that there is more momentum now to actually affect change, which involves latching onto changing circumstances.

      Pretending that things are the same as ever only leads to a defeatist attitude, where people conclude that apparently it’s worked so far, might as well continue doing it.

  • Foni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    3 days ago

    What the hell is a government doing using someone else’s cloud? I have a small business and I bought a Synology NAS years ago. How is it possible that a government does not have its own servers?

    • Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, that just doesn’t scale. Don’t get me wrong, what you do works and is good, but you (probably) don’t have an off site backup or 100TB of customer data, that is needed in 17 countries accessed by over 15.000 employees.

      I’m not saying, that you need a public cloud provider for that, there are other companies, that do these kinds of things, but it is more comfortable and as with SAP no manager has ever been fired for proposing using Microsoft.

        • Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Yes, but there are even more smaller companies doing that and in the past a lot of companies did that themselves (if big enough) but “the cloud” is seems just so convenient, that they don’t want that anymore.

    • macniel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Buying service level agreements on rented hardware is easier and cheaper (you don’t have to pay your own IT). Security and data protection, pfft nobody needs or wants that.

        • federal reverse@feddit.orgM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Not necessarily. Standard services like chat and mail and office usually come in standard packages. You do need an admin for standard services too but one admin can easily take care of dozens of users across dozens of services. The devops team is something you only need if you’re running custom cloud applications which I would imagine a lot of companies don’t do at all.

        • varyingExpertise@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          “Yes, but that’s another departments cost. Or some lobbyists told me this is cheaper. Anyway, we’re locked into the whole thing by now, doesn’t matter anymore.”

    • B-TR3E@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      What the hell is a government doing using someone else’s cloud?

      Fucking up everything. Thar’s what governments do for a living,

  • modifier@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    The cloud is a tool of oppression in the wrong hands, and it is in the wrong hands.

    Let the sun shine in.