Nemeski@lemm.ee to Meta@lemdro.idEnglish · 1 month agoMeta claims torrenting pirated books isn’t illegal without proof of seedingarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up163cross-posted to: nottheonion@lemmy.worldpiracy@lemmy.dbzer0.comtechnology@lemmy.worldpulse_of_truth@infosec.pub
arrow-up163external-linkMeta claims torrenting pirated books isn’t illegal without proof of seedingarstechnica.comNemeski@lemm.ee to Meta@lemdro.idEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square17fedilinkcross-posted to: nottheonion@lemmy.worldpiracy@lemmy.dbzer0.comtechnology@lemmy.worldpulse_of_truth@infosec.pub
minus-squareArcka@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 month agoWhat’s the precedent and current consensus for caselaw? I remember that Capitol v. Thomas kicked off the notion of “making available” as an infringement of the distribution right, but I haven’t followed everything that came after.
What’s the precedent and current consensus for caselaw? I remember that Capitol v. Thomas kicked off the notion of “making available” as an infringement of the distribution right, but I haven’t followed everything that came after.