I thought I had finally found a healthy drink I liked with no artificial sweetness and they had to go and fuck it up

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    This label part about plastics is what’s called green-washing here, and is illegal unless what they are doing is a very signifikant part of the price of the product.
    The labeling of what’s NOT in the drink is also under similar regulation, but I don’t recall what it’s called. But the fact that a “sugar” drink doesn’t contain fat is irrelevant and misleading.

    Whatever country this is from has bullshit regulation.
    The thing that is ABSOLUTELY NOT a problem is the Stevia which is clearly labeled!

    So the “mildly infuriating” part is completely misguided compared to the real problems of that product.

    Edit:

    Just noticed, Carbs 3%, sugar 6% incl. added sugar 12%.
    That’s impossible! You can’t have less carbs than sugar, since sugar is a carb. So these labels are probably illegal in EU on no less than 3 counts!!

    • ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s a US label and the percents are % of recommended daily intake. So that’s 3% of your daily recommended carbohydrate intake, 6% of your daily recommended intake of sugar, and 12% of your daily recommended intake of “added” sugar. The recommendation is something like, no more than half of your carbs should come from sugar, and no more than half of those should be added during manufacturing (i.e. most of your sugar intake should be from fresh fruit, etc.). So the numbers do line up.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        In reality there is no recommended sugar intake. We can do perfectly well with zero grams of sugar every single day for a whole life, without it causing a single health issue.
        So the label remains nonsense.

        There is a recommended intake of vegetables and fruit, but not for sugar. Not by any factual based health measure.

        • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          This is exactly why, for many years, there was no percentage on the label. They were concerned that people would try to get it to 100%.

          Fast forward a few decades, and it’s extremely rare to find Americans consuming that little sugar, so the concern was no longer valid.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        The only country I know of, that could have this shitty and misleading label and still be legal is USA, but I don’t know that for a fact.
        I think if I saw these labels here in Denmark, I would call the police or health authorities immediately on the spot, which are responsible for enforcing declaration rules on items meant for consumption.

        Those labels are not merely mildly infuriating, they are attempts at scamming consumers.