• desktop_user
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I kinda wonder why the billionaires only have super-yachts and not aircraft carriers

    • Teh@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I’m pretty sure that most of these hyper-yachts have helicopter pads. For transporting one person and their mistresses, it takes up a lot less topside real estate. The plebes can spend time on a boat between harbor and yacht if they need to get on or off.

      • desktop_user
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        aren’t planes faster than helicopters though? I guess that doesn’t matter as much though as the yachts stupidly spend time near coasts normaly, but I still find it weird that there are AFAIK no privately owned aircraft carriers.

        • MonkeyTown@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Probably because a skeleton crew for one of those is an absolute shitload of people (Nimitz-class carriers have a standard compliment of 3,200, not including the air division, so pilots and mechanics and such)… and like sure you could probably get rid of some stuff and cut that in half, but it would still require a lot more staff than a super yacht (20-50 crew), including nuclear technicians/engineers and stuff which would probably be expensive.

          Plus you’d be spending a ton to demilitarize and make the below-decks spaces comfortable, as that’s the vast majority of the ship. But in so doing, you may actually alter the ballast of the ship causing it to float higher and become unstable…

          Why bother when you can get a status symbol custom made for you, you know?