• meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    49 minutes ago

    Ah, the Fox Business brain trust peddles its economic logic—golden parachutes for public servants framed as fiscal savviness. “Get a real job” drips with the private sector’s trademark disdain for anyone not chasing quarterly bonuses. Federal work—infrastructure, disaster response, public health—reduced to a punchline in their profit-worshiping catechism.

    The arithmetic is perfect: swap lifelong stability for a one-time payout and genuflect before the gig economy’s algorithmic altar. Feast on capitalism’s crumbs before the vultures pick the bones clean. When has short-termism ever collapsed industries or gutted pensions? The real crisis? A world where civil service is mocked while hedge fund carnage gets tax breaks.

  • Fontasia@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 hours ago

    “Get a real job” says person to audience who view her as a walking uterus

  • scripthook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The irony that a News Anchor is telling Federal Workers to get a “real job” when she could get one herself

  • limelight79@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I’m a federal employee and have been for 25 years.

    Some years back my parents were visiting from Florida and asked to borrow a car (I had two), and I said sure. Then, later, I said something about how busy work had been, and my father starts laughing at how funny that is - and calls my older brother - so they can share a laugh about me “working hard”. Both lifelong Republicans, I will note.

    I was like, hey, did you want to borrow the car that my hard work paid for, or not?

    When I called them out on it, they said I was absolutely correct and apologized.

  • katy ✨
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Bold card for someone who puts on makeup and reads a teleprompter for 3 hours a week.

    • hovercat
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Bold to think they can read, and aren’t just ad-libbing whatever wet fart of a thought enters their head.

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Funny how they’ll say this to federal workers, but they won’t say shit to the military who are living the socialist dream.

    • FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Yeah, and if you ever ask a vet what they did, unless they’d been to literal war, they’re going to tell you that they were basically just put in charge of stocking a broom closet and were bored 95% of the time.

      Edit: just want to add that I do respect the military, and if anyone wants to tell me why I’m wrong, I’d love to hear lol

      • LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        My mom was a mechanic in the army and never got deployed. For her mandatory four years, she just fixed trucks in the day and got wasted with other mechanics at night. She says it was a job, not actual service. She doesn’t consider herself a veteran because she didn’t do jack shit.

  • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    And many of the people I’ve talked to among different agencies are taking this offer. Those that were sort of close to retirement, for example December and the like.

    So wait, is this dumb bitch expecting us to believe these people are forgoing their entire retirement for a few months pay? Or does she expect us to believe that retiring them a few months early and saving one or two months pay (basically fucking pennies) is saving significant government money? I genuinely don’t know what else she could mean.

    I guess that’s what they do though. Throw out useless anecdotes, say it’s a good thing, and let the user generate feelings based off it while having no idea what it actually means.

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Right, these are likely people with fully vested pensions basically taking terminal leave above and beyond their accumulated leave. Most feds can accumulate 240 hours of leave to be cashed out on retirement. Trump basically offered people nearing retirement the opportunity to cash out 1280 hours. Much efficiency. Very cost savings.

    • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      This. And there is no way Trump will keep any “deal” that costs him money. He has literally built his business around stiffing contractors. No one should trust him or expect him to keep his word.

  • dan69@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Yo like, there hundreds of people without a job already. Why did she want to have the unemployment offices flooded.

  • DrPop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Even if I wanted to take the deal I’d have to work until 5/15 anyway because of the agency I work for. I haven’t heard of anyone taking it around me.

    • prole
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The federal government is the largest employer in the US, and I believe I read, the largest employer of each individual state as well.