ShiverMeTimbers@lemm.ee to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoWhat sounds like a double standard but isn't?message-squaremessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up170
arrow-up170message-squareWhat sounds like a double standard but isn't?ShiverMeTimbers@lemm.ee to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square47fedilink
minus-squareTedesche@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27·2 days agoNo, that is a double-standard, it’s just a double-standard you’re arguing is justified.
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 days agoit would be more of a double standard if the two groups were on equal footing, but they’re not.
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·2 days agoThe definition of a double standard is that it’s unjust. At least, in common English.
No, that is a double-standard, it’s just a double-standard you’re arguing is justified.
it would be more of a double standard if the two groups were on equal footing, but they’re not.
The definition of a double standard is that it’s unjust. At least, in common English.
Mmmmm…meta-injustice…(drool)