Summary
JD Vance argued that courts cannot overrule Trump’s executive orders, likening judicial interference to an illegal overreach.
Critics, including lawmakers and legal experts, denounced his claims as unconstitutional.
This debate follows recent federal rulings blocking Trump’s executive actions, including spending freezes and an order ending birthright citizenship.
Opposition figures warned against undermining the judiciary, emphasizing checks and balances.
If the media is cowed, Congress is gridlocked, and the courts aren’t allowed to exercise their authority, then who the hell do they think will serve as a check on presidential power?
That’s the neat part!