Anonymous: Trump is making America weaker and we’ll exploit it. The international hacker community is preparing to strike against U.S. infrastructure and calls for public awareness against incoming fascism

  • absquatulate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    160
    ·
    5 months ago

    Exploit it you say? Please get in line behind the russians, the chinese snd pretty much all arab countries

      • Guy Ingonito@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 months ago

        Next time a blonde haired blue eyed British man named Lawrence comes asking you to rebel against the Ottomans you’ll think twice, huh

      • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        The Saudis did not give the Jared billions for nothing. Just remember, the Saudis and Israelis told Bush to invade Iraq and next up is Iran with Putin’s Sock Puppet in charge. It will be a massive cluster fuck.

          • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            Crap, I should have typed the 1st Gulf War and Bush Sr. You are correct about the 2nd invasion, the Saudis did not want Iraq fractured and the Shite’s gaining power through Iran.

            • PanArab@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              5 months ago

              In the first Gulf War it was out of necessity. Iraqi troops invaded Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Khafji

              Even today, other than wealth, Saudi Arabia is a much smaller country than Iraq with half its population -Saudi Arabia’s population figures are inflated since over 40% are foreigners-. In 1991 Iraq was much stronger, and much more self sufficient, it could have taken Saudi Arabia in days if it weren’t for the coalition forces.

              • Venator@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                5 months ago

                -Saudi Arabia’s population figures are inflated since over 40% are foreigners-.

                That’s not inflated, they’re still part of the population…

                • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Maybe they don’t count temporary residents like students and foreign worker permit holders?

                  Also can they likely can’t be drafted / join their army?

      • comfy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Iran, for one example, is a prolific cybersecurity adversary of the USA. One of the top four advesaries alongside China, North Korea and Russia. In fact, Iran is believed to be responsible for disclosing a CIA covert channel to China which led to a critical dismantling of CIA assets. I don’t know as much about other Arab states because Iran is most famous for its advanced cyber-warfare capabilities, but honestly, to avoid exploiting the USA would be very foolish.

        Obviously this goes both ways. Israel and the USA are infamous for Stuxnet, a computer virus which reportedly destroyed a fifth of Iran’s nuclear centrifuges in the early 2000s.

        • PanArab@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I just want to confirm that you know that Iranians are not Arabs. Linguistically they are closer to Europeans and Indians.

          • comfy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Sorry, you are correct. I assumed the person you replied to was talking about the whole Middle East region and didn’t think twice for posting.

  • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    124
    ·
    5 months ago

    Anything supposedly said by “Anonymous” as a hacker group should always be treated with immense skepticism.

    There do exist somewhat legitimate sub-factions that actually take serious actions and do serious ops, and also semi-legitimate “outlets” for their statements… but there’s also an overwhelming amount of smokescreen bullshit “anon news outlets” and little script kiddies running around. It’s important/intentional that those continue existing as smoke screen for the more “serious” factions.

    Beyond that, being an anonymous group with no real methods of confirming membership to outsiders (insiders can just check if you’re in the private IRCs and etc) it means that just about anyone and everyone can make some big declaration like this. The proof will be in the results, not some announcement that could be made by a rando.


    All that said, there’s convincing and considerable evidence (collected by Krebs) that members of Elon’s DOGE group have background in the actual hacking ops spaces.

    No matter who is really making these threats/warnings, I think things are going to get pretty dire in the US government IT space. It’s been well known for decades that most government orgs have absolutely abysmal cyber security, and now you have a bunch of young adult tech-bros with no true accountability running roughshod over all of it. Then there’s the fact that more than one of them have “serious black hat hacker” backgrounds.

    Going to be one wild ride.

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      little script kiddies running around

      Yeah, they’re running around the Treasury Dept right now.

      It’s been well known for decades that most government orgs have absolutely abysmal cyber security

      Having worked with government agencies and a lot of large private organizations the thing that keeps them mostly secure is the amount of red tape involved with things. Patching a production system requires a teleconference with at least five different people and no one person knows everything.

      The idiots without any security experience coming in to “streamline” things will just make the systems even more fragile and insecure.

    • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t know about government overall, but the military and HHS have has some of the most stringent security stances I’ve encountered. To the point where just working for them was a massive chore. (How effective they were I guess I don’t know, but working for them sucked.)

      That said, I’ll take what you said on faith, because I think you’re spot on with everything else.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        5 months ago

        Often, ridiculous and onerous procedural security is hiding massively incompetent actual software security or is used to constrain people from discovering security by obscurity holes. Everything I’ve done in government interfacing as a vendor would seem to confirm this, at least back when I was doing it a few years ago. You’d be hard pressed to convince me it’s changed much since.

      • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        I once answered a phone call inside a com closet on base. Military IT was already escorting me. Security came because the cameras in the closet detected the camera on my phone. It’s definitely physically tight security.

      • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        I had to help the SSA implement SAML authentication once and they weren’t even allowed to share their screen so I could see what they were doing. Totally agree that it’s a massive chore.

      • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        That said, I’ll take what you said on faith, because I think you’re spot on with everything else.

        I mean, it’s not a secret that governments everywhere run really outdated software (think things like Windows 7 and older) because “it works”, so it really shouldn’t be too surprising.

    • reksas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I guess its pointless to believe their words since there is no way to know if its them. Just look at what they actually do and judge based on that.

    • comfy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      There do exist somewhat legitimate sub-factions that actually take serious actions and do serious ops

      Any examples or sources for me to learn more about these? The only Anonymous news I’ve heard of since the early days is updates on Kirtaner.

  • Ozymati@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    ·
    5 months ago

    Can they do something useful like destroy the debt infrastructure and delete all student loans and medical bills?

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        5 months ago

        “Anonymous” isn’t like a formal group. The entire point is that anyone can say that they are anonymous. So yeah, people talk a lot. You can do whatever you like as anonymous.

      • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        mostly they are spending hours scrolling through social media accounts of certain types of people looking for dox materials. that’s really about it

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      5 months ago

      A more useful thing would be to do as much damage to Twitter as possible. In fact, why they haven’t attacked Twitter while Musk has been disarming all of its safety protocols is fucking beyond me.

      • Juice@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        5 months ago

        Attacking twitter would be more useful than deleting all debt? I mean go wild, take that shit ass site down but if you had a “delete twitter” button and a “delete all debt” button, mashing the second one would make you the greatest hero who ever lived.

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Debt is monitored/store by many different companies

          Even if you took down all data of x health insurance company it would still exist in other places

          So I would say that it poses a bigger challenge and you would have to do it at roughly the same time

          • Juice@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Sure. Yeah its very hypothetical and silly. As if the Banks that manage national and international money supplies, since most of their managed assets are debt, haven’t thought of it? So no such button exists, whereas there might be a delete twitter button somewhere or one could be rigged up 👀

    • Randelung@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m sure backups and redundancies are “inefficient” since “everything is in the cloud, anyway”.

  • meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.worksBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    5 months ago

    Ah, Anonymous—the digital equivalent of a fart in a hurricane. Trump’s America? Weakness isn’t new—it’s baked into the propaganda circus we’ve called democracy since Reagan. You think script kiddies and Elon’s crypto-bros “hacking fascism” will fix anything? Please. The real op is watching tech oligarchs and politicians collude while we argue about which flavor of dystopia we’re slurping.

    Infrastructure attacks? Bold move, Cotton. Let’s see how it works out when grandma’s dialysis machine gets bricked by some edgelord’s Python script. If you want revolution, stop fetishizing IRC nostalgia and touch grass. Until then, this is just digital graffiti on a burning trash barge.

      • nomy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        5 months ago

        What a pointless thought-terminating comment.

        Do you have any actual critiques or just lame regurgitated snark to try to win imaginary points?

        • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Well, meowmeowbeanz has a good point, namely, Anonymous saying anything is meaningless. Because Anonymous is a not a group, at best it could be called a movement, at worst it’s just a name. In any case, anybody can claim to speak for them. Hence their statements are meaningless.

          However, meowmeowbeanz’s post is also a barely coherent rant with overused emphasis. Which makes them seem mentally unwell. It’s like encountering somebody with a tinfoil hat ranting about how the earth is round.

          • meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.worksBanned
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Anonymous isn’t meaningless; it’s amorphous, which is the whole point. It’s not a movement or a name—it’s a void anyone can step into, wielding chaos as a weapon. That terrifies institutions built on predictability. Sure, it’s messy, but dismissing it outright ignores its potential to disrupt systems that thrive on control.

            The emphasis wasn’t overused; it was deliberate. The propaganda circus? Real. Tech oligarchs colluding with politicians? Also real. If calling that out feels unhinged, maybe it’s because the world is unhinged, and pretending otherwise is the real insanity. Tinfoil hats? No. Just tired of people mistaking cynicism for clarity while the trash barge burns.

            If that makes me sound mentally unwell, fine. At least I’m awake enough to notice the fire.

            PS: tag me next time with @ so I can see your reply, almost missed it!

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    This is kinda what trump wants. If the government cant handle “online stuff” they can pitch privatization. It hurts more if tech megacorps get hacked. Though at this point I wou’d laugh if a bunch of internet nerds got the nuclear codes or locked up a bunch of satellites

    • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      If the government cant handle “online stuff” they can pitch privatization.

      It kind of already is privatized. Most of the government’s cyber security efforts are handled by defense contractors.

      • IMongoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        CISA actually monitored Internet traffic and would contact government entities (local, schools, universities, etc) when they were being attacked. I went to a talk once where they said they usually had response times in minutes, and it would take longer to figure out who they needed to alert and convince them that it was real. Now that CISA is gutted I would expect more and worse breaches in the future.

    • bufalo1973@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Imagine if one nuclear head was pointed to every megacorp headquarters in the US.

  • prole
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    5 months ago

    Well I hope they choose their targets right, otherwise it’ll just make everything worse.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      That’s kind of inevitable right now. The most important thing is making sure Trump and the GOP get the blame. Well, them or Russia.

      Actually, the best targets aren’t the government. It’s big business.

  • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Tomorrow

    Trump: By executive order, I dismantle the computer warfare and defence division

    Musk: It doesn’t exist anymore!

    The day after

    Anonymous: They turned off their service that sanitized all inputs. We just stole everything from every department, and put cats on every governments webpage.

    • ArtVandelay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      “The government had both server and client side validation, which is totally wasteful and inefficient! I removed both and may the best one win!”

      Elmo, DOGE

  • HurlingDurling@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    5 months ago

    Anonymous, if you are going to do it, PLEASE make sure to leave the innocent people alone and go after the rich assholes that are doing this.

    Other than that, here’s my axe, go wild

  • WhatSay@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    5 months ago

    Hacker fashion tip: while wearing your guy fox mask, match it with a Luigi hat.

    • Jestzer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t know if this is the point you’re making, but IIRC, they are a disorganized group, so anybody can claim to be part of them.

      • Otter@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yea I think that was the joke in that scene, but I can’t seem to find a clip of it

    • Semperverus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      5 months ago

      Its more of a chaos entity. Because anyone can be a part of it with literally no steps other than saying “I am Anonymous”, anyone can say or do anything. As a result, one person or group may claim Anonymous while doing a legitimate hack, while another person who is just a script kiddie won’t ever actually do anything and you get this hot and cold, will they won’t they effect as a result.

    • Hackworth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      My final semester in American Sign Language was “Sex, Drugs, and Profanity,” and most of the signs are just exactly what you’d guess. (I held on to those textbooks.) Plus, facial expressions are a big part of the grammar of the language. I don’t recognize this scene, but assuming it’s from a comedy - it’s probably also not far off from accurate.