• reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The paper was published in 2008 and I don’t know enough about European politics to know the shifts since then but you can download it here.

      Looks like they categorize Germany as MMP (“Germany, New Zealand and Mexico also have a mixed member proportional (MMP) system, where about half of the members in parliament are selected by closed party lists to correct partisan imbalances resulting from the election of electorate candidates by plurality rules”).

      • tetris11@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Ah I see, that makes sense, cheers for this. I never knew that despite living there for many years. It really did seem like your vote counted directly towards both party and candidate - didn’t realise MMP isn’t under the umbrella of PR

    • Sunshine (she/her)@lemmy.caOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      More people vote under pr thus increasing interest in democracy. People tend to vote more when their votes actually count for the smaller parties / independents.

      To your point on Germany, there’s much more involved in having a robust democracy than simply an electoral system. The culture of the society is one.

      But you’re from lemmy.ml, so you’re just trying to sabotage democracy any chance you can get.

      • tetris11@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        (oh wow, no I was asking an honest question and ml was the instance first offered to me, jesus)

        In Germany, I’m seeing lots of people vote tactfully to keep the AfD out which seems to be a new trend, so I’m not sure how robust PR is in the long run there. Still better than FPTP, of course.