• trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    There is no need for an explicit ban, as such dehumanising and abusive nonsense should already violate a dozen existing laws in any country that respects human rights.

    • Ziglin (they/them)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      It sounds like it does as like they say in the article the UN classify it as torture. If people ignore that and choose to torture people anyway it’s probably useful to have a ban on the specific type of torture that people are trying to avoid.

      • trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        The only reason to explicitly ban one particular type of torture is if you want to allow other types of torture at some point.