- cross-posted to:
- fediverse@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- fediverse@lemmy.world
You must log in or register to comment.
I’m all for every admin deciding what’s best to de-federate from their server, but I really dislike that people are trying to influence other servers through shaming them for not de federating from the same servers as them.
That’s the whole point of the fediverse so that I can decide myself who I want to engage with and who not, if every server has de federated from the same list of other servers what’s the point of the fediverse?
Differences in instance-level topical focus and moderation philosophy, for one. Also physical location and “vibe”.
There are a certain set of bigoted and/or extremist instances that I would judge an instance for not defederating from. There’s a reason I’ve stuck with .world even through some turbulence. Some heinous shit shouldn’t be tolerated by anyone.
There’s a reason I’ve stuck with .world even through some turbulence. Some heinous shit shouldn’t be tolerated by anyone.
At least for me, during the Reddit migration when I was looking through instances to pick from, my main concern was not the fact that instances were a thing unlike others (I was already familiar with the fediverse from Mastodon) but none of them looked like they had strict enough moderation. Aside from this one (which, wouldn’t you know it, are operated by admins that also operate a microblogging fedi instance) and Beehaw. And Beehaw was having tech issues wrt registration applications.
Most instances out there seem to just be an attempt to be “the next Reddit” (including .world) but that’s not sustainable in the long term. That’s how you get the bare minimum “moderation” that’s on mastodon.social, .online, universeodon and co. At least now that the hype has died down smaller instances that want to be communities on their own right are getting built, which is the direction Lemmy in general should move towards.
Lemmy could be much improved by letting users block instances.
This means that all content from communities which are hosted there is hidden. Posts from users of blocked instances are still visible in other places.
Cool! Although it’s not quite what I imagined. It’s widespread problematic posts and comments from users on instances I’d want to block in other communities I do follow which I was thinking of, and those wouldn’t be affected? I have not seen a whole lot of it so far, but I saw enough to think about it a little.
It might be more complicated, as I suppose you’d have to hide all the replies to comments from user-blocked instances as well. Maybe it could be done client-side? Seems like giving users that option would mean less motivation for defederating.
deleted by creator
I had no idea that hashtags were that old, they’re a teenager now. It was interesting to learn about how they were used.
