Ascend910@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-22 months agoTaxation will not work, we need to just take and devide their moneylemmy.mlimagemessage-square46fedilinkarrow-up1916file-textcross-posted to: rpg@lemmy.eco.br
arrow-up1916imageTaxation will not work, we need to just take and devide their moneylemmy.mlAscend910@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-22 months agomessage-square46fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: rpg@lemmy.eco.br
minus-squareasdfasdfasdf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up21·edit-22 months agoI’d argue there should be a flat out cap on wealth. Nobody should have 500 billion dollars. Not sure what it should be, but somewhere under 500 billion.
minus-squareCowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up15·2 months agoWould be nice, would still require a revolution.
minus-squarePiemanding@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up10·2 months agoYou can have a soft cap with higher taxes as wealth goes up.
minus-squareSlopppyEngineer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·2 months agoTo name a few: the classic riot, violence and/or revolution the coup organizing through unions and have general strikes until things change sustained peaceful protest voting switching to a different (underground) economic system massive emigration All come with some serious downsides of course.
minus-squareCowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 months agoWould require either revolution or threat of it to pass to a meaninful degree.
minus-squareSlopppyEngineer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoTurns out that technically they don’t have wealth, just a lot of loans with paper assets as collateral.
minus-squareeatCasserole@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoIf voting could dethrone the wealthy, they wouldn’t let us do it.
How tho?
I’d argue there should be a flat out cap on wealth. Nobody should have 500 billion dollars. Not sure what it should be, but somewhere under 500 billion.
Would be nice, would still require a revolution.
Acceptable
You can have a soft cap with higher taxes as wealth goes up.
To name a few:
All come with some serious downsides of course.
or to sum it up: socialism
Tax wealth.
Would require either revolution or threat of it to pass to a meaninful degree.
Turns out that technically they don’t have wealth, just a lot of loans with paper assets as collateral.
With votes, sadly.
If voting could dethrone the wealthy, they wouldn’t let us do it.