Ascend910@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-210 hours agoTaxation will not work, we need to just take and devide their moneylemmy.mlimagemessage-square46fedilinkarrow-up1868file-textcross-posted to: rpg@lemmy.eco.br
arrow-up1868imageTaxation will not work, we need to just take and devide their moneylemmy.mlAscend910@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-210 hours agomessage-square46fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: rpg@lemmy.eco.br
minus-squareasdfasdfasdf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up21·edit-221 hours agoI’d argue there should be a flat out cap on wealth. Nobody should have 500 billion dollars. Not sure what it should be, but somewhere under 500 billion.
minus-squareCowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up15·18 hours agoWould be nice, would still require a revolution.
minus-squarePiemanding@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up10·19 hours agoYou can have a soft cap with higher taxes as wealth goes up.
minus-squareSlopppyEngineer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·23 hours agoTo name a few: the classic riot, violence and/or revolution the coup organizing through unions and have general strikes until things change sustained peaceful protest voting switching to a different (underground) economic system massive emigration All come with some serious downsides of course.
minus-squareCowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4·18 hours agoWould require either revolution or threat of it to pass to a meaninful degree.
minus-squareSlopppyEngineer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·21 hours agoTurns out that technically they don’t have wealth, just a lot of loans with paper assets as collateral.
minus-squareeatCasserole@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·13 hours agoIf voting could dethrone the wealthy, they wouldn’t let us do it.
How tho?
I’d argue there should be a flat out cap on wealth. Nobody should have 500 billion dollars. Not sure what it should be, but somewhere under 500 billion.
Would be nice, would still require a revolution.
Acceptable
You can have a soft cap with higher taxes as wealth goes up.
To name a few:
All come with some serious downsides of course.
or to sum it up: socialism
Tax wealth.
Would require either revolution or threat of it to pass to a meaninful degree.
Turns out that technically they don’t have wealth, just a lot of loans with paper assets as collateral.
With votes, sadly.
If voting could dethrone the wealthy, they wouldn’t let us do it.