• merci3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    146
    ·
    23 days ago

    Canonical deserves most of the critics they get.

    Ubuntu users on the other hand don’t deserve even the slight amount of critic they get for just… Using Ubuntu. like, at least they use Linux, we should be encouraging them to keep using it.

    • lengau@midwest.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      23 days ago

      I have my own criticism of Canonical, but most of what I hear from the anti-Ubuntu crowd isn’t even grounded in reality.

      My favourite one recently was that upstart was Canonical NIHing systemd.

      • Cenzorrll@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        22 days ago

        Didn’t upstart show up in jaunty jackalope? I don’t recall systemd being all that big back then. Also, jaunty booted in 30s to desktop on a 4200rpm spinning rust IDE drive, Intel m processor. In my book they succeeded there but yeah, the attitude they have about contributing to current projects is bullshit.

  • lelgenio@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    23 days ago

    Q: what does apt install firefox do? Surely it uses apt to install Firefox, right??? A: The command gets highjacked by snap, which promptly crashed and hangs.

    Ran into this just a few hours ago, made the mistake of suggesting Ubuntu as a sane default (instead of debian or something else), never making that mistake again hopefully.

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      What does apt install firefox do in Debian?

      package »firefox« has no installation candidate

      Firefox isn’t in Debian’s repository, cause it moves too fast for Debian’s release cycle and is too complicated for their security team.
      Debian instead offers firefox-esr
      Ubuntu instead offers firefox snap

    • lengau@midwest.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 days ago

      So would you prefer they just remove the firefox package from new releases without offering an upgrade path?

    • 7rokhym@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 days ago

      Here’s a thought: Before installing packages you don’t understand, go to the Firefox site and follow their instructions which work fine on Ubuntu and doesn’t install snap.

      I’m not a fan of snap either, but with all software, people need to RTFM. Not do the dumb thing and then cry on the Internet seeking hive mind rage when the dumb thing happens.

      • limelight79@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        22 days ago

        I’ve followed those directions, only to find snap firefox was reinstalled a few months later.

        Switched to Debian, much happier.

        • superkret@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          22 days ago

          Usually I hate when people ditch an entire distro because they don’t understand or refuse to understand its quirks, but…

          Switched to Debian

          At least there was a happy ending.

          • limelight79@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            22 days ago

            Where was I refusing to understand its quirks? After several years of using snap-based Firefox, I came to the conclusion that I didn’t like the snap based installation of firefox. So, I followed the directions to go back to a deb-based Firefox installation. But Kubuntu “helpfully” reverted it a few months later, and that cycle repeated a few times.

            I specifically requested the deb-based installation and it ignored my wishes. I know what operating system that reminds me of, and it isn’t Linux.

            I’m sure someone will tell me I’m wrong for wanting a .deb-based Firefox and that snaps are better anyway. Even if that’s true (I don’t care to argue), I chose a path and Kubuntu overrode my choice. Silently, too.

            I’ll also note that I started using Kubuntu back in 2008 or so, and stopped last year. I used it on both my desktop and laptop machines. So, it wasn’t like I just tried it for a few hours and got upset; I was a long time user that was quite familiar with how it worked. For most of that time, I was really happy with Kubuntu, but having it override my explicit configuration was extremely frustrating.

            Others can continue to use it, that’s fine with me. This isn’t a personal attack on anyone’s choices.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        22 days ago

        I think expecting people running Ubuntu to RTFM is a longshot. The people installing it want an experience where they don’t want to put any effort into learning how things work. If they did they probably would run something else.

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    23 days ago

    Yeah, I don’t get the hate and intentional division being sowed there.

    I’m not a fan of Ubuntu since they went all Thanos Snap (the final straw was replacing deb packages in apt with snap stubs), but I can applaud that they’re using Linux.

    Just seems like low effort, pointless gatekeeping to me.

    • Kroxx@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      23 days ago

      Yeah I never understood the hate but today I did read a comment saying Canonical (the company that develops Ubuntu) had injected some amazon telemetry into one of the search functionalities, that and using Snap is what makes some people shit on it. I didn’t verify the telemetry thing FYI.

      I can definitely understand people being upset at telemetry injections.

      The above is to say I don’t think it’s exclusively people gate keeping, dome people have legitimate issues with it.I haven’t seen people shit on mint a lot and it’s an easy distro. Honestly most people are super supportive of mint. That being said there is definitely some amount of gatekeeping.

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        22 days ago

        That was the point where I stopped using it.

        They included a global search function which in a default installation sent your search terms to Amazon and returned search results from them.
        It also sent them to a web search (with real time results while you typed, including image previews). So it was possible to get shown NSFW images accidentally inside your OS, without opening a browser.
        It was just really bad design, and a heavy-handed attempt of monetizing their OS.

        Of course that could all be removed with a bash one-liner, but it showed where Canonical was headed,

      • Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        The thing is, that noobs see linux = ubuntu, and ubuntu makes sure it stays like that.

        I do not like that.

  • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    22 days ago

    Ubutu sucks really bad. I installed it checks notes 17 years ago and I didn’t even get internet running out of the box. Fedora 41 is just so much better and I can’t see how anyone can argue with that.

  • SitD@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    23 days ago

    i started with Ubuntu. i think it’s fair to respect the distro that works towards getting any rando started

    • Petter1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      But they teach them Linux in a way, that it just feels like cheap MacOS, where you have to hack your own OS in order to get some little stuff as you like.

  • pH3ra@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    22 days ago

    Well Ubuntu os not that bad if you just stick to the ecosystem. I mean… Not everyone… Pffft… Wants to… HmmHMpf… Babysit… Ahahahah I can’t…

    Just install Mint

    • lengau@midwest.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      22 days ago

      No thanks. The Mint maintainers keeping provable misinformation in their documentation despite being called out on it makes me distrust them.

  • Aelis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    23 days ago

    I get the annoyance around tribalism/elitism, some people in other posts pointed out the fact that silly dramas and bad/dumb linux takes scares out new users but tbh I feel more confortable with a vocal community, even a silly one. Feels healthier and more alive to me than a mute and apathetic one.

    If something goes wrong, if something displeases someone we will hear about it, people will get angry, at the worst we get a nice entertainment to watch and a good laugh, at the very best it leads us to some nice changes.

    It’s something I grew to like about Linux, even the silliness of it all, even how you can’t really tell if people are dead serious or not about the stupidest things.

    • pulverizedcoccyx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      22 days ago

      Amen brother. I’m really hoping a lot of these gotchas get ironed out in some way as more people start choosing Linux over windows. I would be really happy to see some smoother experiences in the coming year or years. Don’t get me wrong, things are a bajillion times better than ten years ago, but there’s still a ways to go yet.

      • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        I switched to fedora cold turkey a few months ago and honestly its a better experience than windows by far. As a bonus games that work poorly or don’t work on the os they were made for, work on linux now.

        • pulverizedcoccyx@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 days ago

          That’s really cool to hear! I had a bad Fedora experience on my surface pro 4, it was silverblue - an immutable distro. Not a great start, so I think I’ll be giving it another shot in it’s natural glory some time this year.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    Yeah no it does suck it made me think the Linux experience was at least 3x worse before I tried another distro.

    And not just a DE thing, every part of the distro feels like it was slapped on without actually thinking of the consequences.

    • netplan
    • apt
    • default systemd dependencies
    • ubuntu GNOME
    • snap
    • ubuntu pro
    • cloudinit conf

    You can find forums and docs from as old as Fedora 11 that’s still relevant yet Ubuntu utterly fails to keep consistency across a single version update because they changed something that’s only mentioned in the changelog.

    Every downstream of Ubuntu is essentially focused on removing all the BS the upstream has so you can use your computer without something breaking like it’s Arch an overused meme about Arch.

    There is no right answer to the correct distro, only a wrong answer, and that is Ubuntu because practically anything else including its downstreams like LM are better for you as a user.

    • Semperverus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      without something breaking like its arch

      I have had seven full-system failures across the last two decades using Ubuntu that could not easily be troubleshooted and fixed.

      I have had exactly zero with Arch.

      Take that as you will.

    • hangonasecond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 days ago

      I had similar bad luck with Linux mint. So many things just didn’t work, or didn’t work correctly. Wifi issues, sound issues, graphics issues, issues setting up particular things for software development. I’ve switched to NixOS and I’m having a much easier time. A significant amount of my improved experience could be attributed to more patience or just an improved ability to deal with problems. I also suspect cinnamon was causing some of my problems, somehow whereas now I have GNOME on my main rig and lxqt on my laptop.

  • noodles@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    22 days ago

    My experience with Ubuntu was filled with bugs and i hated snaps, suggested it to a friend and installed it for him and he kept getting errors and bugs everywhere for some reason, he had the impression that linux is a buggy mess. I’m not suggesting ubuntu to a new user ever again, fedora is the way to go, i just wished they had nvidia drivers in their repos it would have made it easier for new users

          • atlas@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            22 days ago

            same and never had an issue with x11. two monitors at different resolutions and different refresh rates.

            • Semperverus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              22 days ago

              You haven’t noticed the issue then. X11 tends to run everything at the lowest common denominator, and doesn’t allow per-monitor scaling.

              • atlas@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                22 days ago

                news to me as ive run this setup for 8 months now and it runs with 0 issues. one is always at 144 and other at 60. minor performance drop with both on at the same time although that’s to be expected, but it definitely doesn’t set them both to lowest denominator.

          • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 days ago

            60hz graphics tablet and 144hz gaming trashitor running fine on nvidia. Graphics tablet didn’t even need drivers installed and huion app launched every time unlike windows.

        • skooma_king@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          22 days ago

          (I didn’t downvote you, just fyi, don’t know why someone would)

          I personally have no issues with x11 if i’m using just one monitor, but if I use two or more I have nothing but issues. I am a tired sysadmin and don’t want to fight my personal equipment at home.

    • lengau@midwest.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      22 days ago

      Configuring Kubuntu for my liking is way easier than configuring mint for my liking, and some of that mint configuration is going out of the way to undo things the mint maintainers did intentionally.

      • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        Then you chose right! Regarding Ubuntu I have been using it for work VMs and it’s adequate, my current annoyance is that you can’t easily change the UI colours to distinguish different projects, because it’s not the “Ubuntu way”, maybe I’ll find a hack.

  • CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    23 days ago

    for me it’s snaps and the release model that suck. Also, apparently, arch-based distros are more noob-friendly, thanks to ArchWiki

    • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      22 days ago

      arch-based distros are more noob-friendly

      I’ll take some of whatever you are smoking. And I am typing this on an Arch Linux system.
      Sure, I love that I have a high degree of control; but, if I were planning to ask a new user to install Linux, I would not be handing them Arch. The Install Page may look nice; but, it’s a minefield of “oh go chose something” and you come back three hours later having read way too much detail about bootloaders.

      Arch is fantastic for choice, but the KISS principal is not available via pacman. It may be available in AUR. So, go learn what AUR is, spend way too long picking an AUR package manager only to learn it’s not available their either and you need to build it from source.

      Joking aside, I do need to try the SteamOS install. That might actually be a noob-friendly Arch distro.

      • CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        22 days ago

        That’s why i said “arch-based” not “arch”. I don’t know about manjaro actually, lots of people on the internet complained how broken it is (or rather was broken, idk), so i decided not to try it. But i’ve tried and am currently running EndeavourOS. The installation process is as easy as the one of Ubuntu, while OS remains stable, despite me using AURs and manually compiled packages. AURs are far more friendly compared to PPAs. Not to mention the fact that i wasn’t always able to find the package i needed among PPAs, and manual compilation often did not work due to Ubuntu’s update model.

        I don’t quite understand, what do you mean by “KISS is not available via pacman”, so please, elaborate. To me pacman is as simple to use as apt.

        Also, didn’t know SteamOS is already available for public, good to know. Gonna try it some day.

        • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          22 days ago

          I don’t quite understand, what do you mean by “KISS is not available via pacman”

          I was making a joke about Arch not being simple and pacman not having packages one would expect, often having to turn to AUR to find such packages. Seems the joke failed to land and now we’re in “explaining a joke is similar to dissecting a frog” territory.

    • lengau@midwest.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 days ago

      I use snaps on multiple non-Ubuntu systems because they solve problems for me in a cleaner way than anything else has done so far.

      I also find arch-based distros to often be quite obnoxious to manage, but that’s just me.

      • CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 days ago

        what are the usecases for snaps and flatpaks in the home desktop environment anyway? What are their benefits? Isolation?

        • superkret@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 days ago

          They let you run a rock solid stable base OS with updated user applications.
          Flatpak makes Debian actually great and removes its biggest drawback.

        • lengau@midwest.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 days ago

          In both cases, you get isolation of the applications, yes. In the case of snaps, you can also isolate your system services from each other, limiting the effectiveness of attack chaining since an issue in cups (for example) won’t leave an attacker able to (for example) access your GPU.

          They also decouple the application releases from your distro if you don’t use a rolling release distribution.

  • unknown1234_5@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    22 days ago

    ubuntu is an excellent base, but there’s no reason to use it over other distros based on it. it does nothing better than others and forces snaps on you to the point of not even having flatpak installed by default unlike almost every other distro that is even remotely modern.

    • lengau@midwest.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 days ago

      Meh, I tend to install snap on the non-Ubuntu distros I use. I also think it does a lot of things better, namely “not making me think about my OS when I don’t want to.” Of course, Kubuntu does that better than Ubuntu does.

      • pool_spray_098@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        21 days ago

        I was no fan of Ubuntu. It made me think about the OS nonstop.

        Why is Firefox taking like 8 seconds to load the first time I run it? Much slower than Windows.

        Why do all of my PPA packages break for months straight after a major OS update?

        Why is my CPU using 100% of a core when I connect my Xbox controller? Turns out that was a bug in libusb that had been fixed OVER A YEAR AGO but Ubuntu’s packages were so terribly out of date I couldn’t have the fix yet. That was the last straw.

        Moved to OpenSUSE and never looked back. My system is basically pristine now.