Consequently, the South African billionaire has been put in charge of a so-called “Department of Government Efficiency” to excise $2 trillion from the national budget. Whether this advisory group will be able to take aim at the Artemis program remains to be seen.

  • john89@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 hours ago

    “Government efficiency” is code for tax cuts for the rich.

    It means that any social programs that we benefit from will suffer or disappear altogether.

    What a world we live in. Stop having faith in government and start taking matters into our own hands.

  • abcdqfr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    22 hours ago

    The fact that such clear conflict of interest exists between spacex/NASA and putting musk in the MF whitehouse… I cannot say I’m surprised, anyway.

    • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      22 hours ago

      American voters decided that conflicts of interest don’t matter. NASA will be lucky to survive this administration at all .

  • Thorry84@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    1 day ago

    He knows SpaceX can’t deliver what they promised for the Moon program, so he needs to change the goalposts. Obviously NASA isn’t suddenly going to request less of SpaceX, not without demanding back all the funding awarded. So he needs to have the Moon program replaced with a Mars program, where they don’t need to deliver anything for the next 10-15 years and can delay time and time again.

    • Zetta@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      SpaceX is no further behind than any of the other contractors for artemis, everyone who knows anything about space and space policy knows that no contractor will meet the deadline trump set specifically because he wanted to be on the moon before the end of his second term (he thought he was gonna get reelected last time). Its common knowledge in the space community artemis will not be on time, and has already been delayed.

      I fucking hate musk but you don’t know what you’re talking about, the new head of nasa is gonna be Elons freind Jared Isaacman anyway so it doesnt matter if they’re late at all.

      But you are sorta right on the tail end of your comment, I think musk wants to scrap artemis specifically so a new mission that is almost exclusively done by SpaceX can take its place. Primarily I think he wants SLS to die and starship to replace it.

      Also Elon claims SpaceX is going to launch a starship demo to Mars during the next transfer orbit which is in 2026, and I really hope they do because as much as I hate that bitch space exploration is cool AF.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeap, starship looks cool but is entirely impractical for lunar missions.

      Just to get to LEO its fuel is pretty much completely depleted. So to get it fueled up to attempt a trans lunar injection you’re going to need an additional 8 launches, which all have to link up in orbit.

      Not only is this going to be adding an incredible amount of additional cost, it’s going to be much more dangerous.

      • Zetta@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        There are no humans on starship when it is being re tanked in orbit, so no its not more dangerous to humans. SpaceX are experts at in space docking, proven by their dragon capsule that docks perfectly with the space station evey time, and a startship launch will eventually be cheaper than a Falcon 9 launch. Yes I believe spaceX when they say that because they have always proved the nay sayers wrong (flacon 9 landings) and will continue to do so in the future. So you’re wrong calling it expensive, all launches to retank the lander will cost less than a NASA SLS launch that will actually take the humans to space.

        You sound like a United Launch Alliance shill lol, that’s the arguments they tried to use to win the contract over spacex too.

        I think most of you hate on SpaceX because of musk, and I agree fuck musk, but spaceX is the most revolutionary space company in our generation and I can’t wait to see them continue to prove you all wrong like they always do and keep advancing human space flight capabilities.

    • ininewcrow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      I always love the debate about fantasizing about anyone going to colonize Mars … we’re having a hard time sustaining life here.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Musk is a bigoted lying piece of shit and also a Mars colony could lead to useful discovery, even ones we never could have anticipated. Science should never need to prove itself as useful 100% of the time. Many important discoveries were made by accident.

        I would never ever want Musk to be anywhere near decisions about a Mars mission, or anything else of consequence though. Among many other reasons , he likely would prevent such unanticipated discoveries by being a stubborn narcissist…

      • Zetta@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        I didn’t realize humanity wasn’t capable of working on both issues at the same time.

        • formergijoe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          See the problem with that is Elon would have to hire more people, which would hurt his bottom line and require his money bin to fill at a slower rate. That’s unacceptable.

          • Zetta@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ SpaceX has hired a significant number of people at Starbase for the Starship program and are still hiring for said program

  • OmegaLemmy@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Oh. NASA is getting scrapped?

    I guess the only nation that will continue with spacecraft innovation will be china

  • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    Such a shame that Musk will tarnish all the amazing achievements of SpaceX engineers… What they achieved is absolutely incredible…

  • LaLaLa@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    1 day ago

    Gee wouldn’t have anything to do with sabotaging his competition so he can corruptly profit? Sounds like someone needs to drain the swamp of this scum.

    • azuth@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      He is not even sabotaging his competition. Starship is supposed to be part of the program and despite the spin will not be ready.

      So he wants to cancel the program that has real deadlines so he can keep promising he will colonize Mars in the next 5 years, which he has been claiming for some time now.

    • not_woody_shaw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      The primary reason NASA still exists is as a way to funnel federal tax dollars to the states in a way that doesn’t look too much like socialism. They also spin it as a way to keep rocket engineers skilled up and in-industry in case they’re needed for war.

      The stuff that we care about, the science, and the inspiring future generations, is all just a sideshow to the politicians signing the bills.

        • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          To the politicians, it’s true. NASA is an easy(-ish) sell to the masses. There’s a reason that the funding for NASA has stipulations on what districts certain projects are based in, and what companies make specific parts.

          The space shuttle wasn’t just one company, it was dozens and dozens of companies spread out across the country building high tech and high skill parts. The SLS was based heavily on the shuttle to keep those exact same districts employed with high skill (and high pay) work.

          If congress was ok with NASA actually achieving things efficiently and on time, they’d just give them a budget and a goal, but that’s not how things are funded.

          We still get the end result, it’s just an extremely wasteful way to get there.

          Now look at how military projects are done. It’s the same thing.

          It’s all a jobs program with a big focus on shoveling money towards companies that give a few tens of thousands of dollars towards their local representative.

          • errer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            This is what really annoys me about DOGE: we really do need to cut government spending severely as it is so inefficient, just we need to do it in a precise way that actually preserves the government’s function. Musk’s goal is to cut costs by just removing function altogether.

        • not_woody_shaw@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          If they actually wanted the SLS, it would have been funded in such a way as to have delivered the big orange rocket by now. It’s not funded in that way. The big orange rocket is not the goal of the SLS or Artemis programs. It’s all about “pork barrel” projects, which are just socialism with extra steps and less benefit. And maybe we get a cool rocket and some excellent science out of it eventually.

    • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      This isn’t necessarily true and making this argument gives people an easy way to refute the idea of raising taxes.

      Kropotkin conveyed it best:

      It is told of Rothschild that, seeing his fortune threatened by the Revolution of 1848, he hit upon the following stratagem: “I am quite willing to admit,” said he, “that my fortune has been accumulated at the expense of others, but if it were divided to-morrow among the millions of Europe, the share of each would only amount to five shillings. Very well, then, I undertake to render to each his five shillings if he asks me for it.”

      Having given due publicity to his promise, our millionaire proceeded as usual to stroll quietly through the streets of Frankfort. Three or four passers-by asked for their five shillings, which he disbursed with a sardonic smile. His stratagem succeeded, and the family of the millionaire is still in possession of its wealth.

      We need more systemic change. Granted, a tax policy could be permanent systemic change, but without corresponding political and economic change it’s just as likely to be undone immediately.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Guy who promised he’d be to the Moon by now try to destroy Moon program to cover up his massive failure.

  • Soulifix@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    You want to excise the national budget, do you? Well, start with the fucking national defense budget spending. There you go.

  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Im so annoyed we don’t do more with the moon. we should have machines building structures there and trying out anything we would attempt to do elsewhere to see how well it works.

  • x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago
    hello Kind person my name is elon and i am south african prince and have big fortune . i am asking help for please send me tax fee of $5 000 for retrieval of funds . then i receive $5 000 000 fortune and give you $2 000 000 . 
    
    thank
    
    elon musk
    south afrika pricne
    
  • Hirom@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The Moon seems more strategic than Mars on the short term, and it’s easier to get there, so it make perfect sense to get to the moon.

    Exploring Mars sounds exciting, but having a permanent Mars colony or city is a waste of resources. Mars is a cold, toxic desert with an extremely thin unbreathable atmosphere. So let’s visit and study Mars, but let’s not bother trying to live there.

    • BurningRiver@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Mars is so underrated, it really needs a hype man. The beaches there are amazing, the climate is great, what else do you need? I think Elmo should lead the expedition there and scope out the best places to live. In fact, let’s call it Project Watney.