• EldritchFeminity
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        4 days ago

        Seriously. I read the article, and the entire time, it was just a bunch of facts that all pointed to how poor our living conditions have become under mass surveillance, the commodification of the human experience, and dwindling bank balances, with the completely wrong conclusion that people are just lazy and don’t want to be the one to throw a party.

    • 211@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Depends on the kind of party, it might not take a lot of money. But it does take time and energy.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    5 days ago

    We party because we either have too much time, too much money or too much to celebrate

    We don’t have any of these things

  • Battle Masker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 days ago

    Bourgeoisie headass: You need to party more!

    “You” in question: can I have this weekend off to party?

    Bourgeoisie headass: Fuck no

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s kind of like an Elk’s Lodge. Mainly it’s a bar with cheap drinks and cheap food where everybody has to pass a background check.

        They have holiday events, but mainly it’s a place where there’s all sorts of people, a whole bunch of regulars, and where the bartenders know your favorite drink. There’s even a guy named Norm.