• neidu3@sh.itjust.worksM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 months ago

      Single-use plastic, yeah. Things like Tupperware will stick around unless we go back to using asphalt for food preservation.

      I think we’re going to see single use wax-paper or similar displace the plastic and Styrofoam for your delivery order.

    • FinnFooted@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      Poison the cancer slightly faster than the whole organism! My dad cancer treatment gave him liver disease that eventually turned into a cancer that was way more deadly than his original cancer.

  • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.eeM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 months ago

    People probably wouldn’t believe we sold water in plastic water bottles or shopped with disposable plastic bags.

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      I legitimately do not understand why so many people refuse to drink tap water. I get that an occasional bottle of water is convenient when traveling or something, but some of my neighbors seem to only drink bottled water even at home. The city will literally test your water for free if you don’t trust it for some reason.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Tap in many places has a distinctive ‘taste’ to it. A cheap filter is WAY more useful (and way cheaper) than bottled water though.

      • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.eeM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Where I live, plastic bags and styrofoam are already rare now. Now we just have to wait for people to realize water is free.

  • MTK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 months ago

    Hopefully, single use plastics would be a ridiculous thing in the future, maybe they will look back at it like we look back at asbestos.

    Here is a funny asbestos ad from the past

  • qevlarr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 months ago

    20 years is a bit short but… Eating animals will be regarded as highly immoral, “but everyone knew those animals suffered, right?”, on the same level as we now judge slavery

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s sadly impossible until we guarantee food for everyone. It’s a luxury to choose where and what your next meal is.

        • qevlarr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          This is so weird. Do people realize animals need to eat? Why don’t we eat that food directly? Eating animals makes for less food, not more. Like how 75% of soy is cattle feed, and then vegans get blamed for deforestation for soy beans. It’s ridiculous. Willful ignorance

          • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            Eh, only sorta. Plenty of animals can be fed on things we can’t eat. They tried raising rabbits in NK for example because they can survive off rocky ground that wouldn’t grow crops.

            Third world problem though. First world countries could be vegetarian easily.

          • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            hmmm… over here cows and sheep are fed on banana leaves and some tree I cannot name. I don’t know about you but either of these don’t float my boat too well

    • tatterdemalion@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      This is farfetched. People love meat, and we have for our entire history. Even India only has around 30% vegetarian population. The demand for not just protein but specifically meat will never go away.

      The only way I see us avoiding animal slaughter is by mastering bioengineering to the point where we can grow a perfectly marbled brisket in a lab without actually cloning the whole cow.

    • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      As is, one can only hope. Until a source of animal-like protein can be perfected and become cheap enough for sustained consumption by a lower class individual, some people (more than you realize) will not be able to get off animal proteins due to various medical conditions. I suppose accessible cures for these conditions would be a proper solution as well.

      I’m not even going to touch on the luxury of choosing your next meal here, since that’s been addressed already.

    • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      what do you mean by this specifically, are you talking about the way it’s just taken willy nilly, or how they won’t be as strong in the future?

      • Kraiden@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        C) All of the above.

        I hope it will be considered insane that we pump livestock full of them as a preventative measure, rather than as a treatment, while also prescribing them for every little thing.

        When our current antibiotics are no longer effective at all, I hope that we’ll be able to find new ones and that we’ll be much more responsible with their use. I hope that people in the future will be as incredulous at our current use of them, as we are of using arsenic in makeup.

    • takeda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s true. They already evolved and most of us didn’t even realize. News feeds were added and gradually evolved to use information they know about is to push our buttons and affect our behavior and beliefs.

      They still needed content, but with generative AI that’s no longer necessary, this is why social media companies are so invested in it.

      Social media is no longer social it became a platform to manipulate people. It is much worse than traditional ways of propaganda, because each person gets their customized feed tuned to issues that are more likely to influence them.

    • dingus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Do you mean physical money in terms of paper/plastic/coins or money as a concept? If the latter, how would society function?

          • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Greed was a useful trait when it was down to survival of the fittest before we developed agriculture.

            After that, the usefulness of greed became less relevant over time, and I would argue that at this point, it’s counter productive.

            Just saying.

  • dragontamer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    As someone who has grown up watching Card Catalogs lose to electronic search, Internet Directories lose to electronic search, photo albums lose to electronic search, Curated Network Televisions lose out to ellectronic search, large-scale advertising lose out to electronic search…

    I don’t know. But whatever it is, 20 years from now, we’d say “Why didn’t you have a search engine that could do that for you?”

    • nesc@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      With (general) search engines being on decline for years that looks not all that probable. No popular search engine even searches what you asked it to search more of what you probably meant if you were as dumb as their ai thinks you are.

      • stinky@redlemmy.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 months ago

        Search engines are getting worse because they are moving towards selling you stuff instead of searching for stuff.

        • bizarroland@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          Amazon has become really bad.

          Amazon is like that Stoner Uncle that says shit like, “just trust me bro, you need the DKAIRBGAUENBSHDBDJS 17-IN-ONE BACK MASSAGER TAX CALCULATOR LEFT SIDE ONLY LETTER OPENER CAT FOOD DISPENSER!”

          And instead of providing said Uncle with powerful psychotropic medications and 24-7 supervision we made him into a multi-trillionaire.

        • tatterdemalion@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I think it’s a bit more insidious. Writing a good search engine has become much harder since the first iteration of Google. Yes the root of the issue is greed, but it’s not all the fault of the search engine. Now you have to deal with SEO-optimized marketing material generated by AI.

          Building a “good” search engine today is like entering an arms race.

      • dragontamer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Card Catalogs were these index-cards we kept in a cabinet that helped people look for a book. And don’t say “word of mouth”, because card catalogs didn’t help with that. Card Catalogs helped you go from “Author or Subject” to “Book”, so you were literally trying to figure out a book you already “had an idea” about.

        Tell me, how do you look for new books today? Do you use Amazon’s search engine? Google’s search engine?


        Internet Directories were these lists of webpages that we used to organize. It was before webrings. The gist is that an internet directory is a list of cool websites on a certain subject, and we can keep those lists organized. Alas, no one used them after good search engines were made.


        Curated TV Networks are losing out to Netflix, Youtube, and TikTok. All of which are search-engine based media consumption technologies. All hail the algorithm.

        Now tell me where “search” is actually losing in our society. Maybe Google isn’t as dominant as it once was, but Netflix is still a damn search bar.

        Maybe TikTok is finally something different: you don’t even search anymore. The algorithm assumes it knows what videos you like and shoves the next video into your face.

        • originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Right I think your last point will be the thing we look back on in wonderment. You mean you used to have to TELL the website what you wanted? How am I supposed to know??