• hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Since that article is paywalled: Can someone from there enlighten me? Is it just some of the major platforms? Do you still have access to xhamster, xvideos and whatever? And how likely is it that those get blocked, too, in the near future?

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      6 days ago

      it’s a matter of time before all the porn sites effectively go “we don’t want to deal with this legislation or with handling the PIIest of data. we’ll just IP block this whole region”

      • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Ah, I was under the impression that these porn sites got blocked… But it’s the other way around, the porn sites block the users because they don’t/can’t implement the regulations… Thx for explaining.

        • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          6 days ago

          The regulations are essentially “you need to take the ID of everyone who uses your site and hand it over to the government to protect the children”. Privacy be damned, and I guarantee it’s going to become more and more widespread.

          • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            I got some eID and it’s supposed to do age verification for like a decade now. And they must have hired some proper computer science experts, because the idea was to implement this as a “zero knowledge proof”. Which is a very nice concept: You can prove your age to a porn site completely anonymously, without revealing anything (not even your exact age), just that you’re above a certain age.

            Of course no one uses that system 😑

            The technology for sure is out there. So if the true motivation is to block access for minors… We could just do it. Only takes an id with a chip on it and/or a smartphone app.

            • ego@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              22
              ·
              6 days ago

              Just like accessing direct messages or any other form of personal data, it’s never actually about the children.

              • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                Sadly true. And happens we’ve just started discussing total internet surveillence again, here in Germany. This time it’s an exception from the rule and not about the usual “would someone please think of the children”. But it’s not any better. For some reason they’re always pushing for data retention / surveillance / snooping on private messages here.

      • algorithmae@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        That is actually what is happening. Nothing in the Florida law blocks these sites, they just don’t want to deal with it.