- cross-posted to:
- transgender
- cross-posted to:
- transgender
You must log in or register to comment.
This makes perfect sense if you think about it; I have to read text with neopronouns very slowly because it’s a challenge to comprehend after having been taught traditional pronouns in school many moons ago.
(e.g., Under the old rules, “they” was usually a reference to more than one person.)
Singular “they” has been used since the 1600s at least. Neopronouns are like xim and xer. Which I have never seen anyone use in the wild, honestly. And I’m in the QUILTBAG as well.
It’s common for neopronoun users to not use them “in the wild” because they expect to be disrespected. Often they’ll have a set of standard pronouns that they use normally and only pse neopronouns in spaces they know to be affirming
I’ve seen e/eir/ey used in old scifi stories from the aughts.
I guess that doesn’t really count as “in the wild” though.
Singular “they” has been used since the 1600s at least.
Which is why I said it’s usually a reference to more than one person.
Neopronouns are like xim and xer. Which I have never seen anyone use in the wild, honestly.
Even though it isn’t a neopronoun, for the most part the same applies to “Latinx”.
Latinx was such a stupid choice. Let’s take gendered words with a vowel at the end and replace the vowel with a hard consonant. It makes it so much harder to say and sounds wrong.
They should have picked a more sensible sound that flows like the original words.
It may have been inspired by “x” representing an unknown variable like you would see in a math equation, so in that context, it kind of makes sense.
Yeah I understand why x looks good on paper. As soon as you try to use in in spoken dialog the flaws become apparent. It’s clearly not going to work.
Latine is much better, -e for neutral gender has some decent traction
