(unpaywalled version on archive.today: https://archive.ph/03cwZ)

Interesting figure that comes out of the article: 87% of US teens prefer iPhones. Also the explanations given aren’t quite surprising, I guess it’s mostly because of iMessage. Teens will feel like outcasts if they get an Android phone while their friends still use iMessage because of the green bubbles.

It’s actually hilarious how we allowed consumerism to take us this far and that we have now peer pressure over smartphones.

“You’re telling me in 2023, you still have a ’Droid? […] You gotta be at least 50 years old.”

ouch 😔

    • HarriPotero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      1 year ago

      We have all universally adopted Rich Communication Services, which is an open standard.

      Well, except for Apple. They haven’t adopted it.

      • cloudy1999@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        1 year ago

        Apple’s refusal to cooperate is both obviously profit motivated and infuriating. They’ve engineered this social gulf between iPhone and non-iPhone users. I often wonder about the collective social harm.

        The low res photos and video are natural byproducts of squeezing modern media into an SMS message, but the ‘green’ bubbles take it to another level. The worst part is that the average iPhone user at best is apathetic. Meanwhile Cook suggested last year that we should just buy more iPhones as a solution.

    • Schlemmy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      In 2024 Apple and Google will have to figure it out because the EU are twisting their arms.

    • Joris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s 2023. Why use SMS in the first place? The world except the US has moved on years ago.

      • LaughingFox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m in the US and my thought is that it’s easier to use sms because not everyone uses Signal, not everyone uses Telegram, and those types. If they did… One person would prefer Snapchat, the other would prefer Signal… Too many choices. With SMS, it’s just your phone number, and everyone has a phone number.

        Otherwise you gotta get usernames for different people for different apps… It’s too complicated.

        • Joris@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not username based, it’s based on your phone number. I really don’t get what’s holding people in the US back to move on. Because these arguments don’t apply at all.

          I think Snapchat is more a social media app than a messenger by the way.