ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to Clever Comebacks@feddit.uk · 9 days agoWoman?slrpnk.netimagemessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up1756
arrow-up1756imageWoman?slrpnk.netByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to Clever Comebacks@feddit.uk · 9 days agomessage-square28fedilink
minus-squareOrlandoDoom@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up33·8 days agoSerious answer: Anyone who identifies as one. I literally can’t pin it down more than that as there are exceptions to every rule. Same goes for a man.
minus-squaremihor@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·8 days agoNo. While people have the freedom to call themselves whatever they want, I also reserve my own freedom to call them whatever the f*** I want. It works both ways. At least it should.
minus-squareAllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 days agoremember kids, freedom of speech does not mean freedom of consequences
minus-squaremihor@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·8 days agoI should be able to call a man in dress a man, without any legal consequences. Snowflakes simply shouldn’t be able to terrorize others.
minus-squarepiccolo@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 days agoCalm down King Edward. The scottish cant hurt you anymore.
Serious answer: Anyone who identifies as one.
I literally can’t pin it down more than that as there are exceptions to every rule. Same goes for a man.
No. While people have the freedom to call themselves whatever they want, I also reserve my own freedom to call them whatever the f*** I want. It works both ways. At least it should.
remember kids, freedom of speech does not mean freedom of consequences
I should be able to call a man in dress a man, without any legal consequences. Snowflakes simply shouldn’t be able to terrorize others.
Calm down King Edward. The scottish cant hurt you anymore.
Fear the “devils in skirts”!.
Lmao thats perfect