He generally shows most of the signs of the misinformation accounts:

  • Wants to repeatedly tell basically the same narrative and nothing else
  • Narrative is fundamentally false
  • Not interested in any kind of conversation or in learning that what he’s posting is backwards from the values he claims to profess

I also suspect that it’s not a coincidence that this is happening just as the Elon Musks of the world are ramping up attacks on Wikipedia, specially because it is a force for truth in the world that’s less corruptible than a lot of the others, and tends to fight back legally if someone tries to interfere with the free speech or safety of its editors.

Anyway, YSK. I reported him as misinformation, but who knows if that will lead to any result.

Edit: Number of people real salty that I’m talking about this: Lots

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      There was a big “information” campaign against donating to wikipedia say 6 months - 2 years ago, anyone know what happened/why?

      • antonamo@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        Deutsch
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        It is about the wikimedia content creators not getting a proper share while the wikimedia foundation acts basicly like Peta, Green Peace and other “Charity”-Buisnesses by using drastic and guildinducing ads even in third world countries. The server activty is funded for aprox the next 100 years and the content is created for free. Most of the money is therefore actually going to around 700 employees in the adminstration, that work on new projects, lobbying or ideas like wikimedia enterprise. But this in turn is not what the ads imply.

    • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      really wish there was a way to pay with “Google play” because I found a way to get Google play money by lying to google lol

      • helloyanis@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Well, Google takes 15 to 30% off the in-app purchases made through Google Play, so you would probably be giving back Google their own money anyways, plus it would fool many people who might think they’re giving 10€ when actually they’re only giving 8,50€ or 7€ to Wikipedia and the rest to Google.

        • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Better than letting that survey money expire and staying 100% with Google.

        • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          ding ding ding!
          I use a Firefox extension that occasionally googles random jibberish so about once a day I’ll get an opinion thing asking about the search results. Today I got one that was asking about ‘china next gen aircraft’. I got like 80 cents from it which is 80 cents less I’ll have to pay for my mullvad subscription!