I’d sincerely recommend everyone to read his manifesto and think about it a little bit.

    • hungryphrogOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The state would never ever lie to you and cops can always be trusted.

      • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        58 minutes ago

        One possibility is that Luigi is just a vaguely similar looking guy who happened to be in the area at the time of the shooting. They found some DNA from a coffee cup or similar that he dumped in a trash can near the scene. So they actually do have real DNA evidence of him being in the proximity. Once they were confident they had air-tight proof that he was in the viscinity, the cops just went ahead and manufactured the rest of the evidence. So Luigi really was by chance near the scene of the crime, but it’s Manhattan, plenty of people were near the scene of the crime.

    • Sanctus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I mean they’re taking a few liberties there to.my.knowledge but thats close to the official story and it is contusionesque. Unless Luigi wanted to get caught after letting all CEOs cook for a few days.

      • RadicalEagle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Which I think would make sense if he wanted to send a message. For example: he lays low and check press coverage to see if they report on it the way he wants. If he doesn’t get the reaction he’s looking for then he can turn himself in and get another chance to speak to the public more directly.

        I can see some logic to it.

        His goal wasn’t to get away with murder, his goal was to highlight the system in a way that couldn’t be ignored.

        • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          But why would him be getting caught be necessary here? The motive was pretty obvious simply due to his role as CEO, and the shell casings removed any doubt. It’s not like his “manifesto” revealed much about his motives that wasn’t obvious from the bullet casings. In terms of sending his message, what did he getting caught actually accomplish?

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Well, everybody does stupid things, and he may have wanted to get caught…

      But the entire story is incredibly weird. It looks like those official explanations that say “well, he shot himself on the head and 20 minutes later shot his wife; that’s absolutely the case!”

      • ben@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I think it’s much more likely that he either wanted to be caught, or it could just be that the guy that did something ill advised (killing someone in public while making very little effort to hide his face besides a cloth mask that he pulled down on several occasions) didn’t really have much in the way of a contingency plan.