Lyft and Uber say they will leave Minneapolis if the mayor signs a minimum wage bill for drivers::Lyft and Uber threatened to stop doing business in Minneapolis after the city council adopted a new rule Thursday that would set a minimum wage for rideshare drivers.

  • grte@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    329
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Oh no! Businesses whose ‘innovation’ is doing end runs around labour law, leaving? How sad.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      1 year ago

      And whose business plan is to use VC money to undercut existing taxi services and drive them out of business so that they can increase prices to a profitable point (and beyond!).

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have little sympathy for the taxi companies. They were terrible at what they did for so long. I can still remember the last two taxi rides I had in my life.

        Me stuck a 5 minute drive from work. Every cab company I call wants 40 dollars and only in cash. Why? Because it crossed a town and county line. It took 4 calls before I found one that would take plastic.

        A year later going to the airport and I am fighting a migraine. No AC, cab was filthy, ads are blasting, and smelled. Hey can you turn off the advertisements? I can’t. Buddy I have a really bad headache can you please turn it off? I can’t do that. I will give you five dollars to turn it off. It goes off.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, it wasn’t like the taxi industry was all sunshine and flowers before Uber existed. I cheered them on in the fight for a while before realizing they weren’t my champion but just wanted to replace the existing taxis with their own and had to hike up prices eventually because they were losing tons of money in the meantime.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The “labor laws” you reference only exist to give taxi companies monopolies and provide worse experiences for everyone involved

      • BlushedPotatoPlayers@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not all, they were kicked out from Hungary - although that was less a victory of workers’ rights rather than that of the taxi driver union.

          • DudePluto@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Taxi companies tend to be smaller, more locally owned businesses with actual employees instead of “contractors.” Why would we *not side with them?

            Edit: missed an important word

        • cubedsteaks@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I noticed when I visited Vancouver, BC there were no uber’s or lyft’s available, however - uber eats was available. And most restaurants I walked past had uber eats signs in the windows saying they did delivery. And this was in like 2018

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cool, Columbus Ohio’s bus system offers a subsidized version of Uber and while it sucks in service area the idea and price both make perfect sense for Minneapolis to adopt.

    Rideshare apps aren’t the solution, effective and adaptive public transportation is. Public transit based rideshare is a great way to fill in the gaps of bus and train systems and to push them to fill their own gaps.

    And when all else fails, unionized taxi services.

    Sometimes Silicon Valley feels like the monorail man

      • cubedsteaks@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Public transit is good where I live and I know it’s not good everywhere but I would so rather take the bus or train over uber and lyft. I only take ubers and lyfts if I have a coupon or I absolutely have to take one because its 3 am and there’s no other way to get home.

    • TrainsAreCool@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Sometimes Silicon Valley feels like the monorail man

      Just don’t look up what they’re planning to build for the airport connection in San Jose…

    • macrocephalic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Proper ride sharing would be awesome. It’s love if I could come to work by using an app to find someone going the same way as me and getting a lift.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Public transit based rideshare is a great way to fill in the gaps of bus and train systems and to push them to fill their own gaps.

      That is what I am hoping for. I don’t know how many times I see an empty bus or would save so much time if I could just get from one local station to another instead of going all the way to a main hub and back. The ride share companies are collecting all this data on where populations really need to go. If we could somehow use them for last leg of distance, route bridges, and filling in lines that are over served.

      I am not sure what exactly the best way to structure this but we do have policy experts so that is there job. Some form of public-private partnership.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    1 year ago

    I see no down side here. Taxi unions existed long before Uber and Lyft undercut the hell out of them.

    • elscallr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Those taxi unions had a monopoly in the areas they served (which was far smaller than Uber and Lyft’s service area) and their prices reflected that.

      If Uber and Lyft leave there’s one thing sure to happen: a lot more people dying from being hit by drunk drivers.

      This isn’t a good thing any way you cut it.

      • Skitburd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        dog what

        dude there are like… other rideshare apps

        and taxis still exist

        and Minneapolis has an effective (for America) transit system

        there are so many options in place before breaking the law

        and if paying a living wage is not possible for Uber or Lyft, maybe they shouldn’t be in business

        • BellaDonna@mujico.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Honestly exactly this, if a business is impossible to exist without exploitation then it straight up shouldn’t exist, and if that means our economy can’t exist, it needs to be rethought so goods and services exist to be goods and services, and not a money making scam.

        • elscallr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re doing a terrible disservice to those people who were, and still are, actually enslaved by using that term.

  • Obinice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good.

    Move out of the way for employers willing to follow the law.

    Also side note, why don’t they already have a minimum wage mandated by nationwide law?! Do people not get basic human rights over there? What the actual fuck is wrong with these people?

    If you took away our minimum wage we would topple the bloody government, and that’s coming from England where we hardly get excited over anything. But, that would be an unprecedentedly evil, evil thing to do, with gigantic wide ranging negative effects across the whole nation the likes of which we’ve never seen.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      We do have nationwide minimum wage. These companies get around it though because they drivers are “contract workers” not employees of the company. In every meaningful way, this is bullshit. It let’s them not be required to pay the workers though.

    • Misconduct@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ok calm down beans on toast we get it. If you really care about the nuance of it all over the outrage factor… Well the Internet exists so all that info is out there just waiting to educate ya!

  • Holyginz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 year ago

    This mindset of catering to companies is infuriating. They took the risk creating the business, if they are no longer able to afford to pay wages or have competitive prices they don’t deserve to remain open. That’s the whole fucking point of the free market. Let these companies fail, the country and the economy will recover and new companies that fill current niches and needs will pop up.

    • negativeyoda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      These companies bled investor money for years acquiring market share with their long term viability plan being that self driving cars were around the corner. They’ve been waiting to fire all the drivers but they got grifted by Elon types into thinking self driving tech was imminent.

      They didn’t think they’d still have to pay people. Those salaries were supposed to be a temporary loss leader

      • jcg@halubilo.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s no way the plan was ever to actually create a fleet of high tech cars they own and maintain themselves, which depreciate over time and eventually have to be replaced. Surely that was just a lie to get the money.

  • Free Palestine 🇵🇸@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh no, there will be small local taxi companies instead of some random multi-million dollar corporations, how bad! And people won’t have to download their trashy apps that are filled with trackers.

    • macrocephalic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      I actually think the app was the best part of Uber (not necessarily the Uber app, but the concept). In my city it used to be annoying to catch a taxi; you either had to line up at a rank, or call and wait and hope that your taxi turned up. Apps allowed you to order a car to wherever you were - normally with just a few minutes notice. I rarely use either now but I believe that taxis have comparable options now.

      • Free Palestine 🇵🇸@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I prefer apps too, but I don’t want to install corporate spyware on my phone, just to call a taxi. Thankfully both Uber and Lyft have pretty good web apps, and never have to let them touch my phone.

    • Buffalobuffalo@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      What assets? All they have is debt and maybe some servers. I guess the app and brand has some value, but only to another ride share company.

      • SgtThunderC_nt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If we’re talking total fantasyland, I suppose put those employees to work building a government backed alternative or an open platform to allow smaller companies?

        Suppose you had a centralized federated system where states or municipalities or even companies could have their own drivers but it’s a common app?

        Edit to add you could also have both driver and passenger rate each other and allow both to filter by rating, lower ratings would naturally pay more or less to compensate for the service. I bet in cities you’d have luxury versions of the same services all from the same app, but also cheap shitty services too.

        • Buffalobuffalo@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The existence of Uber and Lyft does not prevent the government from doing this. If we are paying people to build and maintain this process we may as well hire people to do so. Taking over Uber would lead to the best employees leaving for other tech companies.

          • SgtThunderC_nt@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think you’re underestimating how many people want to work for the government for the perceived benefits. I’m saying they have the stuff already set up, in fantasyland it would be a fairly smooth transition.

    • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      They don’t own the cars, they don’t hire employees. We’d be left with an app? Some servers? We don’t need that stuff to run a decent public transportation service.