• Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      50 minutes ago

      They banned porn?? I used to follow Gumroad’s founder on Twitter, he seemed like a good person.

      • podperson@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        13 hours ago

        This is definitely what it’s supposed to do (and a great feature) but unfortunately it doesn’t work that well. Have tried this many times, especially with Amazon links, and it seems to be a bit inconsistent in its effectiveness.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          If a platform gets traction and is good at removing them, then links will be more obfuscated to deal with it.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          You probably also need to clear your cookies as well. I can’t really see this being done only via GET

          • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Yeah, I cannot imagine any reason they wouldn’t use cookies to track this. The moment you arrive via an affiliate link they’re going to know that that’s how you got to the site for that session.

          • ivn@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I don’t understand. Cookies and request method are two different things. You can set cookies on GET.

      • solrize@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Oh nice, that is pretty new, but will have to see if it works on those gumroad links. I have an offline script (not a browser extension, I haven’t bothered figuring out how to write those) that edits urls to remove tracking and it’s quite a pain, since there are dozens of sites and tracking schemes it has to know about. Also, rather than creating a pasteable url, a suitable browser extension should just rewrite the link automatically before navitation when you click on it.

      • ivn@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        This is about removing tracking arguments that identify users, this is not the case here.

        The example in your link even show it’s keeping campaign tracking arguments. So I’m pretty sure it would keep the one we are talking about here.

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      That’s how basically all affiliate links work.

      This time it’s just the merchant getting more or less from the creator. vs doing the split with the linker and the merchant.

      Also 10% is pretty low, normally merchants take like 30% cut by default so they have plenty to share.

    • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The parameters are how you get to the store.

      If the creator is driving the traffic, Gumroad takes 10%. If Gumroad is driving the traffic, they take a commission of 30%

        • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Not any more than any other tracking method. They control it all.

          If anything, the fact that they give you a method to alter how your purchase is tracked so you can still give the creator 90% when you get to them through their store is pro-creator.

          • renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 minutes ago

            The ability to alter the tracking is an exploit, not a feature. Don’t get me wrong, I’m glad it’s possible, but it seems more a result of a lazy implementation rather than a generous choice.

            Not any more than any other tracking method.

            This isn’t true. There are more opaque ways to track this like cookies, redirects (triggering an api call), and scripts. These could also be exploited depending on how they’re done, but it would be way less obvious than just changing the URI.

            It just seems like they chose the simplest method, thus hampering the effectiveness of their greed.