• GNUTup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Violent bloodthirsty evil thug, then. Is that better for you, Herr Pedant?

      • GNUTup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        Orchestrating a scenario in which the only possible outcome is self-defense by deadly force sounds an awful lot like premeditated murder, to me. I think you should reevaluate what you consider pedantry.

          • GNUTup@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            People attacked him because he had a big gigantic deadly gun and was goading a literal angry mob with the gun.

            It’s now more clear to me than ever that you are intentionally acting in bad faith. What is wrong with you?

            • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              People are attacking him because he has a big gigantic deadly gun

              He has a right to carry a gigantic gun.

              goading

              Carrying a gun is not considered goading by any sane person.

              • GNUTup@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                It absolutely is considered goading. If lifting your shirt to reveal a gun holstered can be considered a threat (one that police can legally shoot you over) then carrying a rifle at a protest and starting shit with the protestors is also a threat.

                He didn’t go there to make his voice heard — he went there to intimidate and kill.

                • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  then carrying a rifle at a protest and starting shit with the protestors is also a threat.

                  If a person threatens someone and gets attacked, he cannot claim self-defense. The jury decided he did not threaten them. It would have been murder otherwise and he would be in prison.

                  • GNUTup@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    The jury also decided OJ Simpson was innocent. Get fucked, boot licker