• gazter@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 days ago

    Without doing the math, that means they’ve broken several barriers in solar panel development, and this paint is more efficient than regular solar panels. If true, these guys aren’t a car company any more, they are a solar company.

    • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 days ago

      And the absolutely last thing we should be painting with this stuff is a vehicle that will likely spend much of its time inside a garage. If this breakthrough technology truly exists we should be painting all kinds of other things with it instead including currently existing solar panels apparently.

    • Lugh@futurology.todayOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Without doing the math, that means they’ve broken several barriers in solar panel development,

      I’m borrowing this from elsewhere, but someone has done the math and says it works out.

      The typical daily driven distance is only around 50 km or 30 miles, EV consumption is around 4 mpkWh so that’s sound 7.5 kWh to recover in LA it’s 9 hours average sunshine per day. So we need to collect solar energy at a rate of 830 W.

      At 25% it’s 3.4 kW solar radiation.

      Solar intensity in LA is only around 300 W/m2

      So you need 11 m2 coverage.