Is it bots? Are those humans whos mission is to cause chaos? Is the weird behaviour caused by the creation of the concept of lemmy?

Somebody please explain to me wtf is going on.

They answer destructive comments, assuming shit, demanding shit. Are they trolls?

Are they being paid for causing chaos? It’s insane

  • Eldritch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    19 days ago

    Certain authoritarian ideologies and well, ideologies in general. Depend on rejecting ideas and evidence. Ideologies are ideal, but not real. So it tends to devolve into shouting and name calling. Leninists hypocritically haranguing liberals and vice versa etc.

    I would definitely be down for some anarco communism. But I think it’s offensive to repeat the misnomer that ML is communism. Or ever has, ever will lead to communism. Anyone who looks to enact change through brutal, murderous suppression via a vanguard party. Could hardly exude a more juvenile thinking vibe. That “it’s okay/good when we do it” BS.

    • sit@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 days ago

      I learned something from your comment. Thank you.

      Explains a lot of things that happen rn. Gaza, Ukraine, harsh cut between right/left.

    • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      Weird how an ideology that depends on rejecting ideas and evidence keeps adapting to new evidence and contexts.

      I wonder why Cuban marxism is so different than Chinese marxism which is different from Soviet marxism, which is different from every south american country’s marxisms.

      One might even think they’re taking a Scientific approach to Socialism.

      • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        Interesting how in every case, they betray their anarchist allies as soon as they get even a feeble hold of state power. There must be a really good peer reviewed paper that conclusively suggests that must be done. Scientifically.