This one doesn’t sound like she was serious, but it’s a look at what is to come.

  • Pons_Aelius
    link
    fedilink
    13411 months ago

    This one doesn’t sound like she was serious

    Quotes from the voice mail she left. (what a fucking idiot to give a voice recording of this)

    “You are in our sights, we want to kill you,”

    “If Trump doesn’t get elected in 2024, we are coming to kill you, so tread lightly, b—h. … You will be targeted personally, publicly, your family, all of it.”

    Sounds serious to me.

    • sylver_dragon
      link
      fedilink
      4011 months ago

      Serious or not, the target won’t know and the harm done by them is real either way. The criminal needs to be locked up and hopefully rehabilitated. If the latter isn’t possible, at least she won’t be able to follow through on the threats from a jail cell.

    • athos77
      link
      fedilink
      1911 months ago

      She’s also been charged with the same time three other times just this year; and there’s no mention of the number of times she just got a warning for pulling this stuff. In fact, she was out on bail for similar messages when she did this. This is not a person who is able to handle her emotions who is slowly getting driven over the edge by reich-wing media. She may not head to New York or DC to kill a judge as but she is absolutely capable of shooting a bunch of black people at Walmart or driving through a group of Hispanic workers.

    • Flying SquidOP
      link
      fedilink
      811 months ago

      She also said she was going to kill every LGBT+ person and every Democrat. I really don’t think she was serious. Crazy, but not serious.

      • @MagicShel@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        7911 months ago

        Honestly, I don’t care. I’m sick of death threats for a giggle. Take it as seriously as a hilarious bomb threat at an airport.

        • @PickTheStick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          1011 months ago

          I’m sick of slightly-not-threats in general. I’m always amazed at people for listening to a few interactions between police and crooks and figuring out exactly what they can say and get away with while leaving the victim with no uncertainty that they’ll be targeted. It seems like a majority of the population will happily scream at someone over something small. It’s no surprise that we are seeing escalations into real death threats, regardless of intent or seriousness.

          This whole fucking handbasket seems to be in flames already.

      • @NoStressyJessie
        link
        3011 months ago

        These yahoos literally threaten our lives and then act like we are trying to feed them to lions when we say happy holidays.

        Fuck them, like literally. I wish they were half as put upon and persecuted as they think they are.

          • @NoStressyJessie
            link
            211 months ago

            So, mixed signal time, while not actually advocating for rape, it is usually not about sexual attraction, but more about assertion of power and intimidation.

            So, in the hyperbolically sarcastic “literal” sense of fuck them, their looks are irrelevant.

            • @raef@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              411 months ago

              I know. I wasn’t trying to be pedantic or even serious, but I couldn’t pass up calling out the use of “literal” on that occasion

      • Pons_Aelius
        link
        fedilink
        2411 months ago

        I honestly can’t see why you think this.

        Someone who is willing to make a recording of threats has to be taken seriously.

        Would you feel the same and let it slide if this was directed at you and your family?

        • Flying SquidOP
          link
          fedilink
          911 months ago

          I didn’t say it shouldn’t be taken seriously. There’s a difference between saying someone is not being serious and saying they shouldn’t be taken seriously.

          • El Barto
            link
            fedilink
            1711 months ago

            What does “not being serious” mean in this context, according to you?

            • Flying SquidOP
              link
              fedilink
              711 months ago

              That she wasn’t actually going to do it. I think they were empty threats. But it still needs to be treated as if she was a real threat.

              • Maestro
                link
                fedilink
                1511 months ago

                Thinking this shit isn’t serious is why the US has multiple mass shootings per day

              • El Barto
                link
                fedilink
                1211 months ago

                But how do you know she wasn’t serious?

                And no, “because she threatened to kill all the gays” ain’t good enough.

                • Flying SquidOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  211 months ago

                  I don’t know. I never said I knew. Hence my saying it should be treated as serious.

              • @ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                111 months ago

                Also worth noting… even if we knew for a fact she had no serious intend to carry out her threat - like if there was a recording before and after she hung up the phone laughing about this “prank” - threats on the lives of government officials are crimes. It can influence their behavior. There is no situation where it’s not serious, just like standing up on a plane and yelling “I have a bomb!” is a crime and serious whether a joke or not.

      • @Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        1911 months ago

        I really don’t think she was serious. Crazy, but not serious.

        For a person being shot dead it makes no difference if the killer was sane or mad, sober or drunken.

        • Flying SquidOP
          link
          fedilink
          211 months ago

          Which, for the god knows how many times I’ve said it, is why it should still be taken seriously.

          How many more times do I have to say it?

          • @GCanuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            People are playing by Reddit/echo chamber rules here. Anything that goes even slightly against the grain is jumped on and tried to silence.

            FTR: I heard your intent and don’t think you said anything even remotely wrong. This is a human being who needs to be held accountable, but can also at the same time still require our help, even if it’s just simple human empathy.

            Edit: but to answer your question… 5 more times should do it. :)

      • snooggums
        link
        fedilink
        1011 months ago

        Crazy like the nazis who wanted to kill all the Jews, right?

        • Flying SquidOP
          link
          fedilink
          111 months ago

          If the Nazis were incapable of doing so on their own, yes. But they weren’t.

          • snooggums
            link
            fedilink
            611 months ago

            So setting an unrealistic goal means no progress will be made, and she wouldn’t kill a single person.

            • Flying SquidOP
              link
              fedilink
              211 months ago

              Which, yet again, is why I said it should still be taken seriously.

      • keeb420
        link
        fedilink
        211 months ago

        she, herself, might not be a serious threat. but one must assume that the “we” includes other people who have proven in the past to be serious.

    • Doc Blaze
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Who makes threats over voicemail? How stupid is that to use your voice and phone number as obvious evidence to police if you were actually planning to do it? Imagine posting to Twitter about going to rob a specific bank in 2 days with your personal Twitter account, then posting a selfie with a name tag and facemask and gun in front of your actual house, hashtagging it #ThisIsAStickUp so more people see it. Anyone who makes semi public threats with identifiable information is either a complete moron and shouldn’t be taken as able to be dangerous in any capacity or was never really intending to do anything in the first place and is all bark and no bite. Not serious. Probably just planning to break stuff and yell real loud like on January 6. These people thrive off of intimidation. I doubt anyone would be that completely idiotic to document a murder spree.

  • @eran_morad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    6111 months ago

    Imagine being so blind, so stupid, to not only be a republican, but further be compelled to commit blatant crimes for trump, without regard to evidence.

  • @JuzoInui@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1611 months ago

    She was a raving kook who talked smack on someone’s voicemail, but the next one would follow up their words with actions (and we don’t want that)… The patient cat can’t catch all the mice, but he can catch some and take their fury out on it. The others with soon get the message quite clearly at that point

    • @Efwis@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      11
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      she was “charged four times in the past year” over similar allegations and that she was out on bond on Aug. 5

      This person needs a serious mental evaluation. Not to mention she willfully threw away her freedom to do this stunt. Serious or not she is messed up in the head, like most maga trumpers.

  • @TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    511 months ago

    “Abagil Jo, twat are ew dewin?”

    “Just callin’ death threats to that there judge, cousin daddy!”

    “After that go to the store and pick up some Lucky Strikes. I’m feelin’ frisky and want to make sweet loveins with yew tanight!”