ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to unions@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 24 days agoHow was this a surprise?slrpnk.netimagemessage-square177fedilinkarrow-up1549cross-posted to: leopardsatemyface@lemmy.worldself_owns@infosec.pub
arrow-up1549imageHow was this a surprise?slrpnk.netByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to unions@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 24 days agomessage-square177fedilinkcross-posted to: leopardsatemyface@lemmy.worldself_owns@infosec.pub
minus-squarethe post of tom joad@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·23 days agoNo, of course not, because you two are discussing a hypothetical situation made to be adjacent to a larger point. Keep up dogg, it’s your argument
minus-squareFeathercrown@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-223 days ago We’re discussing hypothetical actions, not our ideal desires here. Sure it would be great to have more than two parties, but in reality, you must vote in a manner that has practical results.
minus-squarethe post of tom joad@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-223 days agoYou like it? I’ve got so much more if so. I’m champin at the bit here Edit for your edit: don’t try and shit a shitter
No, of course not, because you two are discussing a hypothetical situation made to be adjacent to a larger point. Keep up dogg, it’s your argument
We’re discussing hypothetical actions, not our ideal desires here. Sure it would be great to have more than two parties, but in reality, you must vote in a manner that has practical results.
You like it? I’ve got so much more if so. I’m champin at the bit here
Edit for your edit: don’t try and shit a shitter
🤝