Nothing more disappointing to me than seeing a game I might enjoy… and then it’s only available on PC on Epic Games store. Why can’t it be available on Epic, Xbox game store and Steam? It’s so annoying, like you have no choice but to use Epic… which I would literally do ANYTHING not to use.

  • MudMan@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Wait, who want a monopoly? Epic? The Epic store is like a tenth of Steam’s size, and most of that is down to Fortnite alone. Hard to have a monopoly when you’re struggling to break double digit share.

    • Zorque@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      … right, which is why I said they want a monopoly, not that they have a monopoly.

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well, yeah, presumably they all do. I’m sure the kebab place next door would love to have a monopoly, it just doesn’t look like it’s in the cards, you know?

        • Zorque@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yes, and if the kebab store pitched a fit every time someone provided a better product than them, calling that competition a monopolist, I’d have the same criticism of that kebab shop.

          If they’re just doing their best to provide a quality product… I wouldn’t like that they have a monopoly, but if they’re not in any way abusing it… that sounds like they’ve earned their place. The problem lies in the people not putting forth enough effort (despite have the resources to do so) to match.

          • stardust@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            Kebab store if they were epic like in their strategy would not be throwing a fit, but making exclusivity deals with suppliers so that their competitors in the area lose access to them. So trying to increase consumers having to go to their kebab store to get specific meals due to inability of other stores to offer it or not retain the same quality anymore. Also look into regulations to try and prevent potential competitors from opening up next to them or at least delay when they can open.

              • stardust@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 day ago

                They give out free samples though once a week to try to get people to buy their food. People prefer the other kebab store down the block though when it comes to spending on meals.

                • PyroNeurosis
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  I adore this back-and-forth, but is the metaphor here doing anything any more?

                  • stardust@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    Does there ever need to be a reason to pivot a discussion into one that includes delicious kebabs?

          • MudMan@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            No, that’s not how that works at all. Monopolies are bad (and indeed unlawful) even if people think you got them by being super cool.

            Google didn’t get a monopoly on advertising and search by sucking at it. They had the best search engine and design in a crowded market and that’s why you don’t say you “Altavista’d” something. But that’s still a bad thing and they still should get broken up into manageable chunks, as current regulators are trying to do. Ditto for Apple and all these other oligopolistic online companies.

            And… you know, Valve. Maybe. At some point. Not quite there yet. But that’s bad even if you like Steam or if they have the better feature set. Which they do. Especially if they have the better feature set, in fact, because like all these other oligopolistic companies, the more time they have to establish dominance and get people to sink further into their ecosystem the harder it is to break it up later. That’s true of kebabs AND software platforms.