• megopie
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 hours ago

    It’s so bizarre to see this discussion play out on the basis of “health”

    Because there is a legitimate discussion to be had about the economics of how milk pasteurization requirements have affected local dairy farms. How the unsanitary conditions of industrial scale milk production have made it a necessity. How marketing and corporate interests have shifted consumption patterns.

    And yet these fucking dipshits have turned this in to “pasteurized milk personally harms you!” In grifter circles.

    How screwed are we that we can’t talk about the complexities of how corporate farming practices have effected our food supplies with out couching it in terms of “health food”.

    I cannot express how much I hate the term “health food”. There is no such fucking thing as a “health food”.

    It makes me want to rip my hair out when these topics come up.

    • argarath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 minutes ago

      Agreed with everything you said. I had a class about bio processes and one of them was about production of cheese and during the class both our professor and the scientist that was walking us through the chemistry of cheese making were constantly talking how pasteurization was really good for us all and how annoying it was that it made cheese making more difficult because of the way it messed with casein and other proteins, making it so that the cheese wouldn’t “coagulate” correctly (they used a specific term that I cannot remember for the life of me, sorry) but that was all. A protein being bent up a bit doesn’t negatively affect the milk of where just drinking it or using it to bake, Ave even for cheese making there are tequiniques to still make it into cheese with pasteurized milk.