Writing a 100-word email using ChatGPT (GPT-4, latest model) consumes 1 x 500ml bottle of water It uses 140Wh of energy, enough for 7 full charges of an iPhone Pro Max

  • bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 小时前

    140Wh seems off.

    It’s possible to run an LLM on a moderately-powered gaming PC (even a Steam Deck).

    Those consume power in the range of a few hundred watts and they can generate replies in a seconds, or maybe a minute or so. Power use throttles down when not actually working.

    That means a home pc could generate dozens of email-sized texts an hour using a few hundred watt-hours.

    I think that the article is missing some factor, such as how many parallel users the racks they’re discussing can support.

  • vinnymac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    7 小时前

    Why does the article make it sound like cooling a data center results in constant water loss? Is this not a closed loop system?

    I’m imagining a giant reservoir heat sink that runs throughout a complex to pull heat out of the surrounding environment where some liquid evaporates and needs to be replenished. But first of all we have more efficient liquid coolants, and second that would be a very lazy solution.

    I wonder if they’ve considered geothermal for new data centers. You can run a geothermal loop in reverse and use the earth as a giant heat sink. It’s not water in the loop, it’s refrigerant, and it only needs to be replaced when you find the efficiency dropping, which can take decades.

    • Munkisquisher@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 小时前

      Evaporative coolers save a ton of energy compared to refrigerator cycle closed loop systems. Like a swamp cooler, the hot liquid that comes from cooling the server is exposed to the atmosphere and enough evaporates off to cool the liquid by a decent percentage, then it’s refrigerated before going back into the servers.

      Data centre near me is using it and the fire service is used to be being called by people concerned the huge clouds of water vapor are smoke

    • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 小时前

      You can run a geothermal loop in reverse and use the earth as a giant heat sink.

      You need something to move the heat away, like water or air. Having something solid that just absorbs will reach its heat capacity pretty quick.

    • JPAKx4
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 小时前

      It highly depends on every data center, but it is very likely that they do use municipal water for cooling. Mainting a Reservoir is extremely expensive for the amount of thermal mass it requires, these things kick off HEAT.

      • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 分钟前

        I don’t know why they aren’t using reclaimed water from treatment plants. I don’t see why potable water is necessary as long as the substitute isn’t corrosive, but I might be missing something here.

  • frunch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    8 小时前

    I’m sure I’m missing out, but i have no interest in using chatbots and other LLMs etc. It floors me to see how much attention they get though, how much resources are being dumped into their development and use. Nuclear plants being reopened for the sake of AI?!!

    I also assume there’s a lot of things they’re capable of that could be huge for science, and there’s likely lots of big things happening behind closed doors that we’re yet to see in the coming years. I know it’s not all just chatbots.

    The way this article strikes me though, is that it’s pretty much just wasting resources for parlor-game level output. I don’t know if i like the idea of people giving up their ability to write a basic letter or essay, not that my opinion on the matter is gonna change anything obviously 😅

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 小时前

      Think of it like this: rich people accumulate more wealth by paying fewer people to accomplish more work faster, so it’s worth burning through the worlds resources at breakneck speed to help the richies out, right?

  • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 小时前

    The real surprise for me is how little the battery of my iphone holds. Especially compared to my ev6 or what my heat pump guzzles daily. Crazy.