• buttfarts@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 month ago

      The whole point is to let Bibi carry the sins of the country to white wash Israel as a whole. Once the job is done he can be discarded as an unfortunate extremist while everyone laments “what he has done”.

      Israel changes leaders and everybody quickly moves forward without Palestinians being a meaningful presence in the ME

    • bamboo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m pretty sure no country wants to be in the situation so they should all come out and follow Canada’s lead making it clear what would happen. Netanyahu may try to invalidate the ICC ruling by intentionally going to a member state expecting they wouldn’t really arrest him.

  • poo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 month ago

    Good. Terrorists hiding behind fake “antisemitism” should be arrested and hung for diminishing and trivializing actual antisemitism.

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Bibi is the antisemite. He claims that there’s a bunch of Jews who control an ethno state that speaks on behalf of all Jews in the world. And this regime is so wicked evil that they’re committing a genocide.

      He’s literally spreading antisemitic rhetoric that’s causing harm to all Jews.

  • cybervseas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 month ago

    The Trude Abides

    Nice to see this from a major US ally. I hope more nations take Canada’s example.

    • tunetardis@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      No, that’s not the plan. This is the plan. In other words, Canada would extradite Netanyahu to The Hague for trial, at which point the US would send in troops to spring him.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        On what grounds? He’s not one of the people listed in that article.

        • tunetardis@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 month ago

          The subsection (b) specifies this authority shall extend to “Covered United States persons” (defined as “members of the Armed Forces of the United States, elected or appointed officials of the United States Government, and other persons employed by or working on behalf of the United States Government”[8]) and “Covered allied persons” (defined as “military personnel, elected or appointed officials, and other persons employed by or working on behalf of the government of a NATO member country, a major non-NATO ally including Australia, Egypt, Israel, Japan, Argentina, the Republic of Korea, and New Zealand”[9]).