🃏Joker@sh.itjust.works to People Twitter@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 month agoEvil company vs artistsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square40fedilinkarrow-up1702file-text
arrow-up1702imageEvil company vs artistsh.itjust.works🃏Joker@sh.itjust.works to People Twitter@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square40fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarepuppycatlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·1 month agoI’m not asserting anything, I was asking why he was asserting that it was definitively vandalism lol
minus-squareWhelks_chance@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoIf they had paid for use of the wall it would be very easy for them to prove it’s not vandalism. They’ve never said they had permission, that I’m aware of. Can you link to them saying they do?
minus-squarezaph@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoIt makes money to have a famous artist give them free art
minus-squarepuppycatlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agodude. as I just said im literally not trying to make a point, I don’t care enough to find a link or whatever. please get off my booty cheeks lmao
minus-squareangrystego@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoThe point is we don’t know, so we can’t be sure it’s vandalism. We just don’t know.
I’m not asserting anything, I was asking why he was asserting that it was definitively vandalism lol
If they had paid for use of the wall it would be very easy for them to prove it’s not vandalism. They’ve never said they had permission, that I’m aware of. Can you link to them saying they do?
It makes money to have a famous artist give them free art
dude. as I just said im literally not trying to make a point, I don’t care enough to find a link or whatever. please get off my booty cheeks lmao
The point is we don’t know, so we can’t be sure it’s vandalism. We just don’t know.