• SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    … the back doors that have child locks already on them so THEY CANT be opened by said children…?

    That’s what argument you want to use? Seriously? Lmfao the shit people come up with sometimes.

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Yes so what difference does a hard to make emergency access do when in any normal car they can be locked in…?

        It’s hard to access so kids CANT open the door while it’s moving and fall out. Thats why vehicles have the child lock feature available… it’s quite sad that you need this explained.

        • prole
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          I think their point is that child locks are not on by default?

          • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            And? A child can be locked in the back of any vehicle with no way out, atleast teslas have a way to still get out… leave it on, and no law an adult is locked back there, with no override to get out. And that’s your Honda, not even a fancy electric car….

            The point is, they’re crying about children being locked in the back, yet any current vehicle you’ve been able to chose to do that for bloody decades already, yet a car with a feature to overcome that is being decried. You were locked in the back of your parents car, it’s unsafe for children to be able to open doors while driving, so it’s prevented for their safety.

            The hypocrisy that people show just to be mad at something with one actually comprehending why…