Summary

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez addressed Trump’s election win, urging Democrats to move past infighting and post-election rancor to focus on preparing for potential impacts of his presidency, such as tariffs, mass deportations, and censorship.

She criticized some Democrats for blaming the loss on “identity politics,” despite Trump’s campaign centering on white racial grievance and calls for white men to turn out. Ocasio-Cortez pointed to moderate voices like Reps. Tom Suozzi and Seth Moulton, who argued that supporting trans rights hurt Democrats, as misguided.

She encouraged people to engage in direct communication and join physical communities to combat despair and build resilience.

  • zenitsu@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    Guys guys, I know the country is getting taken over by criminal fascist scumbags, but let’s please tone it down online.

    • Tiefling IRL
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      Let’s keep it friendly and civil while the MAGA police is dragging you out of your apartment because you made fun of the orange emperor

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I will never vote for a democrat who opposes trans rights. I’ll encourage my friends not to as well. They want these stupid games they can have the prizes that come with

  • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    2 days ago

    I do think a lot of liberals are spending far too much time trying to score cheap political points…That criticism actually extends to one of Ocasio-Cortez’s top allies in the Senate — Bernie Sanders — as well.

    America is silly. Because of our first-past-the-post electoral system, we are a de facto two party state. As a result, Americans have come to believe that there are only two political or ideological possibilities: liberalism and conservativism. Therefore, everyone is either a liberal or a conservative, and everyone who isn’t a conservative must necessarily be a liberal, and vice versa.

    I am not a conservative, but I am also not a liberal. I don’t agree with either ideology. Yes, generally, I might agree more with the liberals than the conservatives, but that doesn’t make me a liberal. It doesn’t even necessarily make me a liberal ally. Stop calling us liberals. We are not liberals, stop trying to make us part of your group. Stop with the, “hey, we’re all liberals, guys,” no, we’re not.

    Bernie Sanders is not a liberal. If he were a liberal, he would be a part of the liberal, Democrat party. He is not, he’s an independent. He often joins with the liberals, because, again, the liberals are nearer to him than the only other party, the conservative Republicans, but he nonetheless remains an independent. Stop calling us liberals.

    • MentallyExhausted@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      American political lexicon is stunted (probably deliberately). I volunteered my time and donated my money for Bernie’s campaign, and prefer to go by “progressive” since it hits the main points and has an actual caucus in Congress.

      The conservatives I know call me a liberal (if they’re feeling nice), but they also know it’s not accurate, they’re just trying to sow chaos on the left.

      • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t really like progressive because some of the major figures of the progressive era a hundred years ago are people I’d like to keep a large distance from.

        • lemonmelon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          24 hours ago

          You’re talking about La Folette and Wheeler? I don’t remember anything they advocated for being too bad, but I haven’t looked at their proposed policies in a long time. Wouldn’t that be natural of a truly progressive movement, though? What was “progressive” one hundred years ago should hopefully be status quo, and what’s progressive now could scantly be imagined back then.

          • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            23 hours ago

            More like everybody was progressive at the time, from Teddy(a progressive conservative) to Wilson to Hoover. In the end it pretty much just meant liberal. I’m comfortable being a socialist and explaining it from there.

  • CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Democrats once again focused on taking the high road after losing one of the most consequential elections in history. I mean I like AOC but calling for people not to be hostile or divisive towards voters who believe in dragging immigrants from their homes, putting them in camps, and then deporting them to their potential deaths is just not it.

    You can call for unity all you want to but you won’t ever hear those same words from the mouths of republicans.

  • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    What does that preparation look like? Ocasio-Cortez said she’s still taking a moment to process her plan. But she said she’ll personally be “doing a lot more direct communication” — i.e., methods other than social media, which can be overrun with unverified claims and outright propaganda.

    “I think I’ll be planning on using my email list to give a lot more thorough and specific things about what’s on my mind and how to prepare for things,” she said. And she encouraged her followers to get out of their online bubbles:

    I was going to point out that nobody reads those, but then I realized I’m a fucking weirdo who blocks all that shit with extreme prejudice. So maybe it’ll work because normal people apparently read every email they get in detail.

    • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Most people I know either obsessively filter and delete junk like this so their inbox is always empty, or they have 30k emails, all unread, and this’ll just go in the pile.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I am definitely the former. Having an unread email in my inbox drives me nuts. So I basically never sign up for email newsletters.

        • gmgmgm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I unsubscribed from all my newsletters and subscribed to them through RSS where I could. That way I don’t have to be bothered unless i specifically want to read any updates!

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I used to do RSS but I would forget about looking at the feed for so long that there wasn’t much of a point unfortunately.