• jaschop@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    I’ll add that such statistics are very much a moving target, since AVs are still “getting better every day”. The software is (and will be) under constant development, and there will likely be tradeoffs between safety for pedestrians and convenience for passagers (e.g. how sensitive is the trigger for an emergency break?)

    Looking at it as an ongoing relationship between AV operators, regulators and people makes a lot of sense to me. I agree with the points of the video, that operators will likely push for a “just safe enough” standard and try to offload responsibilities onto bystanders.

    • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      There’s also a common argument that the problem in AV accidents is primarily the other human drivers, which is a classic case of “if everyone just immediately changed over to doing things this way it would solve the problem!”