• lugal@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 months ago

    Knowledge is to know that Frankenstein isn’t the monster
    Wisdom is to know he is the real monster

  • Mothra@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 months ago

    Remember once you get around compiling all the cadaveric sources you need to use the proper formatting style for reanimated corpses, not just any style

  • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    in dr frankenstein’s defense it’s kinda hard to get peer reviewed while you’re doing the experiment. that usually happens after you’ve done all the sciency stuff, crunched all the numbers, written up a paper, and sent it off to be reviewed.

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Are you saying he created the monster out of nowhere? There was no prior art? No testing on animals first? He just went all-in with a humanoid monster?

      • Johanno@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean the dead bodies he stole from the graveyard would be less of an issue to Greenpeace than animals.

  • ch00f@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    I enjoy the joke that most mad scientists are really just mad engineers.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    Dr: KILL THE BEAST!! … and let’s restart the experiment again with Abby’s brain