• imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    13 days ago

    Great to see! I’m gonna stick on piefed.social, the performance has been fine for me. But it’s nice to have a North American server up and running

  • Ademir@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    12 days ago

    what are the system requirements? (sorry I think you already said it once but I can’t recall)

    • Rimu@piefed.socialOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Roughly 2 GB of RAM, 2 cores of CPU. PieFed.social has 8 GB and 4 cores for 150 users and that is more than enough power. We haven’t had a very busy instance with thousands of users so the only scaling tests have been to do with federation - “what happens if I join every community”. The UI is very lightweight, tho.

      It really depends how many communities you subscribe to. A single user instance might be able to use less.

      • FundMECFSResearch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        So someone like me that has a couple hundred subscriptions is a far bigger server load that someone who browses via all?

        • Rimu@piefed.socialOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          12 days ago

          Yeah, sort of. The total number of subscriptions (by all users) determines the load caused by federation. If you subscribe to 200 communities then I subscribe to the same 200 the federation load will not increase.

          So once an instance has more than a dozen users pretty much every community that exists will be subscribed to and adding more users will not increase federation load (but it would increase load caused by the UI)